Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1 :04-cv—O1501-KAJ Document 31 Filed 05/O9/2005 Page 1 of 1
I * P1'RM'u:rdAI’Ji7UA TIL O}·FTCI£S
NEWYGRK
LONDON
CHICAGO
HOUSTON
DANEEL. v. For r
oiruzcr omti; 202.651 .4927
E-,ll·f/ill': dfolt@ducmemorrIs com ggzgggwciscc
laI'WlaI'L’»{1ln{l'.I1EJ?IOl"I'l;.S COIN Er-;;S_i;wiT0Nr DC
MI.·‘\l'l·{l
PITTSBURGH
l\/lay 9, 2005 NEWARK
.•\£.U'iN’l`O\VN
X’gll‘1°§£’E
VM E·FILINQ and HAND DELIVER Y ,.,,(msBUm
PRINCETON
The Honorable Kent A. Jordan WNCHESTER
United States District Court
844 North King Street
Wilmington, DE l980l
Re: Future Fibre Tech. Pty. Ltd. VC Ogrellios Incorgorczted
CLA. No. 04-l501~KAJ
Dear Judge Jordan:
I was on the west coast on a ten day business trip when Mr. Day sent the Court his May
6, 12005 letter regarding discovery disputes, and in the rush of business I did not have a chance to
review the cover letter sent to the Court. l did review and approve the proposed scheduling order
and we join Plaintiffs in asking the Court to approve that form of order.
There was an unintended rniscommunication, however, regarding the dispute referenced
at docket nos. 28 and 29. Optellios has not agreed and cannot agree to withdraw that dispute ——
especially given the positions taken in the Rule 12 motion tiled by Plaintiffs and presently
pending before the Court. Rather than argue that dispute here, on behalf of Optellios, we
respectfully request that the Court consider and rule on the issues addressed in docket nos. 28
and 2.9 at a time convenient to the Court.
Daniel V. Folt
cc: Clerk ofthe Court (via e~tlling)
John Ci. Day, Esquire (via editing)
wrmuaszvs i
Duma Monazs iw
l§GONORTl·lMARKElSTREEEZSUIIE1200 wu.Mmeron.usmanners r>uoNr;;m6sv·w¤¤ raxsuzssvisui