Free Order - District Court of Colorado - Colorado


File Size: 8.3 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Colorado
Category: District Court of Colorado
Author: unknown
Word Count: 282 Words, 1,966 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cod/25960/78.pdf

Download Order - District Court of Colorado ( 8.3 kB)


Preview Order - District Court of Colorado
Case 1:04-cv-00791-WDM-BNB

Document 78

Filed 06/28/2005

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No. 04-cv-00791-WDM-BNB STEPHEN H. ADAMS, Plaintiff, v. LANCE DYER, Aurora Police Department, MICHAEL GASKILL, Aurora Police Department, CHRISTOPHER STINE, Aurora Police Department, GERALD JOHNSGUARD [SIC], Aurora Police Department, DAVID ORD, Aurora Police Department, RICHARD DAY, Aurora Police Department, WILLIAM HELLER, Aurora Police Department, JUSTIN THULL, Aurora Police Department, JULIE STAHNKE, Aurora Police Department, LIEUTENANT STEPHENSON [SIC], Aurora Police Department, CAPTAIN CLOYDE [SIC], Chief/Captain of Aurora Police Department in Supervisory, City of Aurora Police Department, and CITY OF AURORA, COLORADO, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ This matter is before me on Plaintiff' Reply to Defendant' Reply Brief in Support of s s Motion for Summary Judgment (the " Sur-Reply" filed June 22, 2005. The defendants filed a ), motion for summary judgment on April 18, 2005. The plaintiff responded on May 20, 2005, and the defendants replied on June 2, 2005. The plaintiff now attempts to submit a sur-reply to the summary judgment motion. The local rules of this court provide that there shall be a motion, a response, and a reply. D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1C. Further briefing is not permitted without leave of court. The plaintiff

Case 1:04-cv-00791-WDM-BNB

Document 78

Filed 06/28/2005

Page 2 of 2

has not sought leave to file a sur-reply, nor does it appear that further briefing is necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff' Reply to Defendant' Reply Brief in Support of Motion s s for Summary Judgment is STRICKEN. DATED June 28, 2005. BY THE COURT:

/s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge

2