Free Motion to Withdraw Document - District Court of Colorado - Colorado


File Size: 32.7 kB
Pages: 1
Date: August 16, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Colorado
Category: District Court of Colorado
Author: unknown
Word Count: 264 Words, 1,936 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cod/25820/49-2.pdf

Download Motion to Withdraw Document - District Court of Colorado ( 32.7 kB)


Preview Motion to Withdraw Document - District Court of Colorado
Case 1:04-cv-01150-LTB-BNB

Document 49-2

Filed 08/16/2005

Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT COURT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 04-cv-01150-LTB-BNB
BARBARA WALDRON; RICHARD SARRO; and ELIZABETH BROOKHART, Plaintiffs

v.
JAMES DRURY, individually and in his official capacity as former Sheriff of the County of Alamosa; DAVID D. STONG, in his official capacity as the Sheriff of the County of Alamosa; CHARLES J. KALBACHER, individually, and in his capacity as former Deputy District Attorney for the 12th Judicial District; EUGENE L. FARISH, individually and in his official capacity as former District Attorney, 12th Judicial District, State of Colorado; DISTRICT ATTORNEY, 12th JUDICIAL DISTRICT, STATE OF COLORADO; ALAMOSA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, a political subdivision of the State of Colorado; ALAMOSA COUNTY, a body corporate and politic; and ALAMOSA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, a political subdivision of the State of Colorado, Defendants __________________________________________________________________________________

ORDER RE: MOTION TO WITHDRAW OBJECTION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR A CONTINUANCE
__________________________________________________________________________________

This matter is before me this Court on Defendants' Motions for Continuance of the trial, which is currently set to commence October 31, 2005. Plaintiffs filed a response objecting to such continuance and later withdrew that response based upon the discovery of new information which may be relevant to this case and desired by Defendants. The Court finds and Orders that the trial set for October 31, 2005, is hereby vacated, and the parties are hereby Ordered to cooperate in the setting of a new scheduling conference so that modified Scheduling Order may be obtained. SO ORDERED this _________ day of ______________________________, 2005. BY THE COURT:

_______________________________________