Free Order on Motion to Remand - District Court of Colorado - Colorado


File Size: 11.1 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Colorado
Category: District Court of Colorado
Author: unknown
Word Count: 319 Words, 1,881 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cod/25507/84.pdf

Download Order on Motion to Remand - District Court of Colorado ( 11.1 kB)


Preview Order on Motion to Remand - District Court of Colorado
Case 1:04-cv-00589-REB-PAC

Document 84

Filed 12/12/2005

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Case No. 04-cv-00589-REB-PAC TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF' MOTION UNDER FED.R.CIV.P. #60(B)(3) S Blackburn, J. The matter before me is plaintiff' Motion Under Fed.R.Civ.P. #60(b)(3) [#80], s filed October 7, 2005. By this motion, plaintiff seeks leave to amend his complaint to add an access to courts claim. I deny the motion. Rule 60(b) allows a party to obtain relief from judgment only when he has shown " fraud . . ., misrepresentation, or misconduct of an adverse party." FED.R.CIV.P. 60(b)(3); see also Cummings v. General Motors Corp., 365 F.3d 944, 954 (10th Cir. 2004). Relief under the rule is an extraordinary remedy that may only be granted in exceptional circumstances. Bud Brooks Trucking, Inc. v. Bill Hodges Trucking Co., 909 F.2d 1437, 1440 (10th Cit. 1990). The burden is on the movant to show that the prerequisites of the rule have been met by clear and convincing evidence. Cummings, 365 F.3d at 955. Plaintiff' motion utterly fails to meet this burden. Instead, to the extent it shows s

Case 1:04-cv-00589-REB-PAC

Document 84

Filed 12/12/2005

Page 2 of 2

anything, the motion suggests nothing more than that the prison' legal library is s inadequate to plaintiff' needs. Assuming arguendo the truth of that averment, it does s not demonstrate that defendants are chargeable with fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct in connection with that circumstance. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff' Motion Under Fed.R.Civ.P. s #60(b)(3) [#80], filed October 7, 2005, is DENIED. Dated December 12, 2005, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT:

s/ Robert E. Blackburn Robert E. Blackburn United States District Judge

2