Free Motion to Compel - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 49.6 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 296 Words, 1,977 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/8788/87-2.pdf

Download Motion to Compel - District Court of Delaware ( 49.6 kB)


Preview Motion to Compel - District Court of Delaware
Case 1 :04-cv-01436-JJF Document 87-2 Filed 01/26/2006 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
ST. CLAIR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY )
CONSULTANTS, INC. )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) Civil Action No. 04-1436 JJ F
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG )
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, L.P., )
MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO., )
LTD., MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC CORPORATION )
OF AMERICA, VICTOR COMPANY OF JAPAN, )
LTD., JVC COMPANY OF AMERICA, NOKIA )
CORPORATION, NOKIA, INC., HEWLETT- )
PACKARD COMPANY, EASTMAN KODAK )
COMPANY, )
)
Defendants. )
)
[PROPOSED] ORDER
The above-entitled matter came on before the Honorable Joseph J. Faman on
, 2006 on Plaintiff St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc.’s ("St.
Clair’s") Motion for an Order Compelling Defendant Eastman Kodak Company to Substantively
Respond to Plaintiffs Outstanding Discovery Requests and to Move Forward with Ownership-
Related Discovery in this Case, dated January 26, 2006. Based upon the motion filed herein and
all the files, records, and proceedings herein, and the Court being fully advised,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
I. St. Clair’s Motion for an Order Compelling Defendant Eastman Kodak Company
to Substantively Respond to Plaintiffs Outstanding Discovery Requests and to Move Forward
with Ownership-Related Discovery in this Case is GRANTED; and
52092vl

Case 1:04-cv-01436-JJF Document 87-2 Filed O1/26/2006 Page 2 of 2
2. Defendant Eastman Kodak Company must produce substantive responses to St.
Clair’s outstanding discovery requests within two weeks of the date of this Order; and
3. Defendant Eastman Kodak Company, along with the other Defendants in this
action, must proceed with ownership-related discovery in this case begimiing as of the date of
this Order.
SO ORDERED this day of , 2006.
Honorable Joseph J. Faman
United States District Judge
District of Delaware
52092vl