Free Affidavit - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:04-cv-01436-JJF
12/03/2004 1 2 : 0 3 FAX

Document 108-5
WILMER CUTLER

Filed 02/09/2006
PICKERING

Page 1 of 2

212 230 8888

a 00 1/002
FACSIMILE

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR
ue J

DATE

399 PAW AVENUE

December 3,2004
TO

NEW

row NEW YORK 10022

+I 2111308BW

FAX

ti 2 l 2 ~ a ~ ~ n a f ~ x
wilmchrkem

Jake M.Holdreith Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi
FROM

fax: 612-339-418 1 phone: 612-349-8500
NUMBER OF PAGES, INCLUOING COVER

Colin Forbes +12129377331

2

This facsimile fransmlsslon k cordkrenlhl and may be pmllleged. If you am not the h W e d redplent. plea@ ImrnedlamJy call the sender w, ll the sender is not avarlabk, call +1 212 W7 7399 and dWmy all copies d t i transmission. If the transmission is incomplete o illegible, please call me sender o ,if hs r r the sender Is no( available, cell +l 212 837 7300. Thank you.

BALTIMORE
MUNIC1.I
NEWYORK

BElJlNG BERLIN BOSTON BRUSSELS LONDON NORTHERN WRWrJlA OXFORD WALTHAM WA5HM30d

PAGE 1M * RCVD AT 1MO 10:59:16 AM [Centrd Standard Time] SVR:MPPRIGHTFAX12 DNIS:612 * CSID:212 230 8888 DURATION (mm-ss):N4 2O4

Case 1:04-cv-01436-JJF
12/03/2004

Document 108-5

Filed 02/09/2006

Page 2 of 2

1 2 : 0 3 FAX

212 230 8888

WILMER CUTLER P I C K E R I N G

rm 0 0 2 / 0 0 2

W I L M E R CUTLER PICKERINC HALE ANDDORR,~

SuBJlECT TO FElDlERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 408
December 3,2004
Via Facsimile
Jake M. Holdreith, Esq. Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi LLP 2800 LaSalle Plaza Minneapolis, MN 55402-2015

William DiSa1vatol.t
3 PARK AVENUE W

N W YOFX NY 1 2 W2
+I 2129377102 +I 212 23a e w e
&lliamd&&~mnimle.torn

Re:

St. Clair v. Samsung Electronics, et a . Civil Action No. 04-1436 l, (U.S.D.C.,D. Del.)

Dear Jake:
We appreciate the time you and your colleagues took on Wednesday to present the Robe~ts patents and your views on the previous litigations. As we discussed during the meeting, in order for us to begin to evaluatc St. ClaVs proposal, we would like 10 review the following documents: (1) the briefing related to the ownership of the Roberts patents; (2) the briefing and any pleadings related to allegations of inequitable conduct; (3) the briefing related t allegations o of laches; (4) the briefing related to marking of patented products; and ( 5 ) any foreign patents related to the Roberts patents, together with their file histories. Finally, cvcn though you mentioned that you would likely not rely on documents to prove a conception date earlier than November 20,1990, we would appreciate the opportunity to review any documents supporting thc statements made in the January 28,2003 declaration of Matthew A. Chikosky in the Sr. Clair u. Sany action.

Thank you in advance for your quick attention to these requests. We look forward to receiving these documents.
Very truly yours,

cc:

Heidi S. Mminez, IGSq. Donald R.Steinberg,Esq. Mark D.Selwyn, Esq.

BALTIMORE
M1JNIC)'I NCW YORK

WJIMG

BERUN

BOSTON
0XK)RD

BRUSSELS

LONDON
WASHINGTQN

NORTHERN VIRGINW

WALTHAM

PAGE 2 RMAT 12MOO4 10:59:16 AM [Central StandardTime] * SVR:MPSUGHTFAX12 DNIS:612 * CSID:212230 8888 I DURATION (mmss):OOU PC