Free Stipulation - District Court of Colorado - Colorado

Case 1:03-cv-02272-RPM

Document 66-2

Filed 02/14/2007

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch Civil Action No. 03-cv-2272-RPM-BNB KIM SYMES and CHRISTOPHER PAUL NORTHCOTT Plaintiffs, v. STEPHEN R. HARRIS, MAGDALEN J. HARRIS, and ROTALOC INT'L, LLC Defendants. [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING TEMPORARY STAY OF PROCEEDINGS FOLLOWING REMAND
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Stipulation for Temporary Stay of Proceedings Following Remand. The Court, having reviewed the stipulation and being otherwise familiar with the matter, hereby ORDERS as follows: IT IS ORDERED that further proceedings in this civil action are hereby stayed for ninety-days to and until May 10, 2007; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if the parties are unable to reach agreement on the terms of settlement on or before April 10, 2007, the parties, through counsel, will work together to schedule a mediation of this dispute with a mediator acceptable to all parties and agree that the costs of retaining the mediator will be shared equally by plaintiffs and defendants; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties will make all reasonable efforts necessary to schedule the mediation prior to May 10, 2007; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if a mediation cannot be scheduled prior to May 10, 2007, the parties will inform the Court of the identity of the mediator and date for mediation and by joint motion

Case 1:03-cv-02272-RPM

Document 66-2

Filed 02/14/2007

Page 2 of 2

request that the Court extend the stay in order to allow the mediation to proceed and, if a settlement is reached, to allow the parties a reasonable time to finalize and execute settlement papers; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if a settlement is not reached during the time that this case is stayed, the parties jointly will notify the Court and request a conference to schedule further proceedings in this case; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Stipulation will not preclude the parties from jointly requesting an extension to the stay upon good cause shown and subject to the Court's approval. SO ORDERED this _______ day of February, 2007. BY THE COURT:

____________________________________ Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch U.S. District Judge

2