Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 57.6 kB
Pages: 3
Date: November 15, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 367 Words, 2,149 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/8723/428-3.pdf

Download Letter - District Court of Delaware ( 57.6 kB)


Preview Letter - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:04-cv-01371-JJF Document 428-3 Filed 11/15/2006 Page1 of 3

Case 1 :04-cv-01371-JJF Document 428-3 Filed 11/15/2006 Page 2 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC., a Delaware
corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR C.A. No. 04-1371-JJF
NTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware
corporation, and FAIRCHILD
SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION,
a Delaware corporation,
Defendants.
Defendants’ Proposed Special Verdict Form
We, the jury, unanimously find as follows:
Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 4,811,075
l. Do you find that Claim 1 of the ‘075 Patent is invalid? (A "YES” answer to this question
is a finding for Fairchild. A "NO" answer is a finding for Power Integrations.)
YES NO
2. Do you find that Claim 5 of the ‘075 Patent is invalid? (A "YES” answer to this question
is a finding for Fairchild. A "NO" answer is a finding for Power Integrations.)
YES NO
Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 6,249,876
3. Do you find that Claim l of the ‘876 Patent is invalid? (A "YES" answer to this question
is a finding for Fairchild. A “NO" answer is a fmding for Power Integrations.)
YES NO
Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 6,107,851
4. Do you find that Claim l of the ‘85l Patent is invalid? (A "YES" answer to this question
is a finding for Fairchild. A "NO" answer is a finding for Power Integrations.)
YES NO
5. Do you f`md that Claim 4 of the ‘85l Patent is invalid? (A "YES" answer to this question
is a finding for Fairchild. A "NO” answer is a finding for Power Integrations.)

Case 1 :04-cv-01371-JJF Document 428-3 Filed 11/15/2006 Page 3 of 3
YES _ NO _
Invalidity of U.S. Patent N0. 6,229,366
6. Do you find that Claim 9 of the ‘366 Patent is invalid? (A "YES" answer to this question
is a finding for Fairchild. A "NO” answer is a finding for Power Integrations.)
YES _ NO _
7. Do you find that Claim 14 ofthe ‘366 Patent is invalid? (A "YES" answer to this
question is a finding for Fairchild. A "NO" answer is a finding for Power Integrations.)
YES __ NO ___
You must each sign this Verdict Form: Dated:
(foreperson)