Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 55.2 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 415 Words, 2,366 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/8723/386-1.pdf

Download Letter - District Court of Delaware ( 55.2 kB)


Preview Letter - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:04-cv-01371-JJF

)LVK

5LFKDUGVRQ SF

Document 386

Filed 09/25/2006

Page 1 of 2
6XLWH 1 0DUNHW 6WUHHW SR %R[ :LOPLQJWRQ 'HODZDUH 7HOHSKRQH )DFVLPLOH :HE 6LWH ZZZIUFRP

! % $ %! ¤9¤ 8"¤ ¤§¤5¢© ¨310 )( 7 6 ¥¡4 2

FB"9CTRS @ C @

¢#Ip8gfi#qVpA F U AI DI

¤ ¤#"¤ '& % $!! ¢© ¤¦§¦¤¢ ¨ ¨¡£ ¥£¡

September 25, 2006

The Honorable Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. United States District Court for the District of Delaware 844 King Street Wilmington, DE 19801

a
§A3DB"BAB@ @ @ C D Q A Q RBHFGBP DI A E 8BHFGB@

Re:

Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor International USDC-D. Del. - C.A. No. 04-1371 JJF

Dear Judge Farnan: I write with respect to the Court's order on Fairchild's motions in limine (D.I. 385), which required each of the parties to take certain actions to comply. First, the Court ordered that Power Integrations provide a redacted version of Mr. Troxel's Summary Report on damages. We have done so this morning. Second, the Court ordered Fairchild to narrow its list of 80 prior art references to seven. (D.I. 384 at 15.) Because the Court did not specify a time for compliance, however, Fairchild has taken the position that it can choose its seven references after the completion of the first trial and that it will not comply with the order before that time. (Ex. A.) Power Integrations disagrees with this reading of the order, and asked Fairchild to provide the list of seven references last week (see Ex. B) because it bears on the issues of willfulness and the doctrine of equivalents in the first trial. And of course Power Integrations was forced to select its seven claims some time ago and cannot change that selection after the first trial, so what Fairchild proposes would provide it a unilateral strategic advantage that we do not believe the Court intended. Respectfully, /s/ William J. Marsden, Jr. William J. Marsden, Jr. cc: Clerk of Court (via ECF and hand delivery) Steven J. Balick (via ECF and hand delivery) G. Hopkins Guy (via e-mail and first class mail)

U X @ @ C TBWVB"¢U3S §9T¢iGQg8I9#"F ` U C C @ h D f CI fGYuvRQBgY8tHFTrV S D A e DI s @ b X Q ` TR¢aV§YD U Q e U S D @ R§#I3dBcF

Case 1:04-cv-01371-JJF

)LVK

5 L F K D U G V R Q SF

Document 386

Filed 09/25/2006

Page 2 of 2

The Honorable Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. September 25, 2006 Page 2
80037272.doc