Free Order on Motion for Leave - District Court of Colorado - Colorado

Case 1:02-cv-01662-RPM

Document 289

Filed 11/02/2005

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch Civil Action No. 02-cv-01662-RPM-MJW CLEAN FLICKS OF COLORADO, LLC, Plaintiff, and CLEANFLICKS, LLC; ASR MANAGEMENT CORPORATION d/b/a CLEANFILMS f/k/a MYCLEANFLICKS; CLEAN CUT CINEMAS; FAMILY SAFE MEDIA; EDITMYMOVIES; FAMILY FLIX, USA, LLC; and PLAY IT CLEAN VIDEO, LLC, Counterclaim Defendants, v. STEVEN SODERBERGH; ROBERT ALTMAN; MICHAEL APTED; TAYLOR HACKFORD; CURTIS HANSON; NORMAN JEWISON; JOHN LANDIS; MICHAEL MANN; PHILLIP NOYCE; BRAD SILBERLING; BETTY THOMAS; IRWIN WINKLER; MARTIN SCORSESE; STEVEN SPIELBERG; ROBERT REDFORD; SYDNEY POLLACK; METRO-GOLDWYN-MAYER STUDIOS, INC.; TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT CO., LP; SONY PICTURES ENTERTAINMENT; DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC.;

Case 1:02-cv-01662-RPM

Document 289

Filed 11/02/2005

Page 2 of 2

DREAMWORKS LLC; UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS, INC.; TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORP.; and PARAMOUNT PICTURES CORPORATION, Defendants-Counterclaimants, and THE DIRECTORS GUILD OF AMERICA, Defendant-in-Intervention and Counterclaimant-in-Intervention.

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF AMICUS CURIAE

Upon considering the Motion for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae of Electronic Frontier Foundation, filed August 22, 2005, and based on the representation of the Motion Picture Studios in footnote 8, page 8, of its Reply Brief [Docket No. 281] that the Studios' claims are not based on intermediate copying, it is ORDERED that the motion of Electronic Frontier Foundation is denied. DATED: November 2, 2005 BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch _____________________________________ Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge

2