Free Answering Brief in Opposition - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:04-cv-01367-GMS

Document 63

Filed 09/19/2006

Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE JULIAN A. MILLER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

C.A. No. 04-1367 JURY OF 12 DEMANDED

Plaintiff, v. STANLEY TAYLOR, ET. AL Defendants,

DEFENDANT IHUOMA CHUKS' RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF JULIAN MILLER'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT For the reasons stated in defendant Chuks' Motion to Dismiss, defendant Chuks opposes plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Third Amended Complaint.

McCULLOUGH & McKENTY, P.A. /s/ Dana Spring Monzo Daniel L. McKenty Del. Bar # 2689 Dana Spring Monzo Del. Bar # 4605 1225 N. King Street, Suite 1100 P.O. Box 397 Wilmington, DE 19899-0397 (302) 655-6749 Attorneys for defendant Ihuoma Chuks Dated: September 19, 2006

Case 1:04-cv-01367-GMS

Document 63

Filed 09/19/2006

Page 2 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE JULIAN A. MILLER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

C.A. No. 04-1367 JURY OF 12 DEMANDED

Plaintiff, v. STANLEY TAYLOR, ET. AL Defendants,

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Dana Spring Monzo, do hereby certify that on this date a copy of Defendant Ihuoma Chuks' Response in Opposition to Plaintiff Julian Miller's Motion for Leave to File a Third Amended Complaint was served electronically upon the following individuals: Sean P. Hayes, Esquire Fish & Richardson, P.C. 919 North Market Street, Ste 1100 P.O. Box 1114 Wilmington, DE 19899-1114 Stephani J. Ballard Department of Justice 820 N. French Street, 6th Floor Wilmington, DE 19801 McCULLOUGH & McKENTY, P.A. /s/ Dana Spring Monzo Daniel L. McKenty Del. Bar # 2689 Dana Spring Monzo Del. Bar # 4605 1225 N. King Street, Suite 1100 P.O. Box 397 Wilmington, DE 19899-0397 (302) 655-6749 Attorneys for defendant Ihuoma Chuks Dated: September 19, 2006

Case 1:04-cv-01367-GMS

Document 63

Filed 09/19/2006

Page 3 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE JULIAN A. MILLER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER And now this __________________ day of ________________, 2006, having considered Plaintiff Julian Miller's Motion for Leave to File a Third Amended Complaint and Defendant Ihuoma Chuks' Response in Opposition to Plaintiff Julian Miller's Motion for Leave to File a Third Amended Complaint, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Julian Miller's Motion for Leave to File a Third Amended Complaint is DENIED.

C.A. No. 04-1367 JURY OF 12 DEMANDED

Plaintiff, v. STANLEY TAYLOR, ET. AL

___________________________ J.