Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 1 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Baker & McKenzie LLP 12544 High Bluff Drive, Third Floor San Diego, CA 92130 +1 858 523 6200
Ali M.M. Mojdehi, State Bar No. 123846 Janet D. Gertz, State Bar No. 231172 BAKER & McKENZIE LLP 12544 High Bluff Drive, Third Floor San Diego, CA 92130-3051 Telephone: +1 858-523-6200 Attorneys for Plaintiff/Appellee KISMET ACQUISITION, LLC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
In re JERRY LEE ICENHOWER dba Seaview Properties, and DONNA LEE ICENHOWER, Debtors. ALEJANDRO DIAZ-BARBA AND MARTHA MARGARITA BARBA DE LA TORRE, Defendants/Appellants, v. KISMET ACQUISITION, LLC, Plaintiff/Appellee.
Case No.: 3:08-CV-01446-BTM-BLM Bankruptcy Case No. 03-11155-LA-7 Chapter Number 7 Adv. Proc. No: 04-90392 Adv. Proc. No.: 06-90369 SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE BY PLAINTIFF, KISMET ACQUISITION, LLC, IN SUPPORT OF ITS OPPOSITION TO DIAZ DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL DATE: August 28, 2008 TIME 4:00 p.m. DEPT: 15 JUDGE: Hon. Barry Ted Moskowitz
/// /// /// /// /// /// 1
CASE NO. 3:08-CV-01446-BTM-BLM SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE BY PLAINTIFF, KISMET ACQUISITION, LLC, IN SUPPORT OF ITS OPPOSITION TO DIAZ DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL SDODMS1/692923.1
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 2 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Baker & McKenzie LLP 12544 High Bluff Drive, Third Floor San Diego, CA 92130 +1 858 523 6200
Pursuant to Rule 9017 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Rule 201 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, Plaintiff/Appellee Kismet Acquisition, LLC requests this Court to take judicial notice of the following document in support of their Opposition to the Diaz Defendants' Motion for Stay Pending Appeal:
EXHIBIT NO. 1
DOCUMENT NAME OPPOSITION BY PLAINTIFF KISMET ACQUISITION, LLC TO EMERGENCY MOTION OF DEFENDANTS MARTHA BARBA AND ALEJANDRO DIAZ-BARBA FOR STAY OF JUDGMENT PENDING APPEAL [FED. R. BANKR. PROC. 7062, 8005] AND EXHIBIT "A" THERETO
DATE Filed August 7, 2008 in Bankr. S.D. Cal., Adv. Procs. 04-90392; 06-90369
Fed. R. Bankr. Proc. 8005 requires that should an appellant's motion request for a stay be presented to the District Court following a denial by the Bankruptcy Court, the "motion shall show why the relief . . . was not obtained from the bankruptcy judge." As is reflected in the Exhibit 1 attached to the Diaz Defendants' Motion for Stay of Judgment Pending Appeal ("Motion"), the Bankruptcy Court denied the Diaz Defendants' request to issue a discretionary stay pursuant to F.R.B.P. 7062: "[f]or the reasons set forth in Part III, Pg. 6-17 of Plaintiff Kismet's Opposition ([Bankruptcy] D.E. #245)." As is reflected in the Exhibit 2 attached to the Diaz Defendants' Motion, the Bankruptcy Court otherwise denied the Diaz Defendants' request for a stay pursuant to F.R.B.P. 7062(d) for the following reasons: "[f]or the reasons set forth in Part II, Pg. 3-6, of Plaintiff Kismet's Opposition ([Bankruptcy] D.E. #245), Diaz Defendants are not entitled to a stay pursuant to F.R.B.P. 7062(d), nor does the Court have the present ability to calculate the appropriate amount of any such bond." In order to complete the record on review, therefore, Kismet requests the Court to take judicial notice of its Opposition to the Diaz Defendants' Motion filed with the Bankruptcy Court, which Rule 8005 otherwise necessitated be submitted by the Diaz Defendants in the first instance in support of their Motion to this Court. 2
CASE NO. 3:08-CV-01446-BTM-BLM SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE BY PLAINTIFF, KISMET ACQUISITION, LLC, IN SUPPORT OF ITS OPPOSITION TO DIAZ DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL SDODMS1/692923.1
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 3 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Respectfully submitted, Dated: August 25, 2008 BAKER & McKENZIE LLP
By: /s/ Ali M.M. Mojdehi Ali M.M. Mojdehi Janet D. Gertz Attorneys for Plaintiff/Appellee Kismet Acquisition, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
3
Baker & McKenzie LLP 12544 High Bluff Drive, Third Floor San Diego, CA 92130 +1 858 523 6200
CASE NO. 3:08-CV-01446-BTM-BLM SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE BY PLAINTIFF, KISMET ACQUISITION, LLC, IN SUPPORT OF ITS OPPOSITION TO DIAZ DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL SDODMS1/692923.1
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 1 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 2 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 3 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 4 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 5 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 6 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 7 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 8 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 9 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 10 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 11 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 12 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 13 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 14 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 15 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 16 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 17 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 18 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 19 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 20 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 21 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 22 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 23 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 24 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 25 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 26 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 27 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 28 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 29 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 30 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 31 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 32 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 33 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 34 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 35 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 36 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 37 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 38 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 39 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 40 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 41 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 42 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 43 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 44 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 45 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 46 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 47 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 48 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 49 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 50 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 51 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 52 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 53 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 54 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 55 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 56 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 57 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 58 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 59 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 60 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 61 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 62 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 63 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 64 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 65 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 66 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 67 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 68 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 69 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 70 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 71 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 72 of 73
Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM
Document 10-2
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 73 of 73
Free Response in Opposition to Motion - District Court of California - California
| File Size: | 2,901.4 kB |
| Pages: | 76 |
| Date: | September 9, 2008 |
| File Format: | |
| State: | California |
| Category: | District Court of California |
| Author: | unknown |
| Word Count: | 1,817 Words, 10,091 Characters |
| Page Size: | Letter (8 1/2" x 11") |
| URL |
https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/casd/276588/10.pdf |
| Download Response in Opposition to Motion - District Court of California ( 2,901.4 kB) |
Preview Response in Opposition to Motion - District Court of California
Popular Searches
United States Free Forms
Canada Free Forms
United Kingdom Free Forms
Australia Free Forms