Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:04-cv-01338-JJF Document 553 Filed 09/13/2006 Page 1 of 1
Rncmaaos, l..Avr0r»i 6. Fiwean
A PROFESSECJNAL ASSOCIATION
Om; Roomev Souane
920 Ncmrw KING Srnesfr
W, M J W Wnuvnworom, Demwnnza isaac: D'*"*E‘~*"' Die'- NUMBER
ass swiss $5-55 We · 5
Aora@msr5 com
FAX (IBOZ) GE I-7701
WWW ,RLF .COM
September 13, 2006
BY E—FILING
The Honorable Kent A. Jordan
United States District Court
for the District of Delaware
844 King Street
Wilmington, DE 19801
Re: Honeywell International Inc., et al. v. Apple Computer, Inc., er al.,
C.A. N0. 04—1338—KAJ
Dear Judge Jordan:
On behalf of Defendant Arima Display, I am writing in response to the Honeywell
Plaintiffs’ letter of September 7, 2006. In that letter, Honeywell states tliat, except for
defendants Epson, Hitachi, BOE——Hydis, Wintek and Toppoly, the defendants "have made
absolutely no commitments to produce documents? Honeywell also complains of various other
alleged deiiciencies in defendants’ responses to discovery. To the extent that Honeywell
intended to imply that Arima Display has failed to participate in discovery, I-Ioneywell’s
statements should be clarified. By Stipulation and Orders entered March 1, 2006, and August
ll, 2006, Ariina Display/’s responses to Honeywell’s discovery requests are not due until the first
week of October. As such, the discovery issues that Honeywell has raised in its letter and any
order entered by this Court relating to those issues should not apply to Arizna Display.
Respectfully,
Véilliam J. Wade
WJW/pc
Enclosure .
cc: Clerk of the Court (By ECF and l-land Delivery)
All Local Counsel ofRecord (By ECF and First Class Mail)
1z.tr1-20sis