Free Order - District Court of California - California


File Size: 24.5 kB
Pages: 4
Date: July 24, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 1,236 Words, 7,511 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/casd/275337/4.pdf

Download Order - District Court of California ( 24.5 kB)


Preview Order - District Court of California
Case 3:08-cv-01329-W-AJB

Document 4

Filed 07/25/2008

Page 1 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 v. 13 14 15 16 17 18 REGUS GROUP PLC; REGUS MANAGEMETN GROUP, LLC; REGUS EQUITY BUSINESS CENTERS L.L.C., REGUS BUSINESS CENTERS LLC, HQ GLOBAL WORKPLACES LLC, THE REGUS GROUP PLC and DOES 1-10, Defendants. ALVIN REYES, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No.08cv1329 W (AJB) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

cal

ORDER SETTING EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION CONFERENCE; BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND BRIEFING REQUIREMENTS

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that an Early Neutral Evaluation of the above entitled action will be 19 held on September 8, 2008 at 2:00 p.m. in the chambers of Judge Anthony J. Battaglia, U.S. Courts 20 Building, 940 Front St., Room 1145, San Diego, California. 21 Mandatory Appearance Requirements 22 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16.1.c of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the 23 Southern District of California, all counsel and each party, in addition to any other person(s) who 24 25 26 27 28 1
08cv1329

Case 3:08-cv-01329-W-AJB

Document 4

Filed 07/25/2008

Page 2 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

has full and unlimited authority1 to negotiate and enter into a binding settlement must appear in person at the conference and must be prepared to discuss the claims, defenses and damages. Governmental entities may appear through litigation counsel only. As to all other parties, appearance by litigation counsel only is not acceptable. The parties must be prepared to present demands and offers of settlement. The failure of any counsel, party or authorized person subject to this order to appear in person will result in the immediate imposition of sanctions. Sanctions will include, but will not be limited to, the attorneys' fees and travel costs of the other parties in the case. In addition, the conference will not proceed and will be reset to another date. In cases where a party is incarcerated at the time of the scheduled conference, arrangements will be made for the incarcerated party to appear telephonically. Preparing for the ENE Plaintiff's counsel must give notice of the Early Neutral Evaluation conference to all defendants making an appearance after the date of this notice. All conference discussions will be informal, off the record, privileged and confidential. In preparation for the Early Neutral Evaluation Conference, plaintiff(s) must submit a settlement brief to chambers, through their counsel where applicable, by e-mail to [email protected] AND serve it on all other counsel and any unrepresented parties by August 26, 2008. Plaintiff(s) brief must include the following: 1. A brief description of the case and the claims asserted;

"Full authority to settle" means that the individuals at the settlement conference be authorized to fully explore settlement options and to agree at that time to any settlement terms acceptable to the parties. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 648 (7th Cir. 1989). The person needs to have "unfettered discretion and authority" to change the settlement position of a party. Pitman v. Brinker Int.'l, Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 485-86 (D. Ariz. 2003). The purpose of requiring a person with unlimited settlement authority to attend the conference includes that the persons view of the case may be altered during the face to face conference. Pitman at 486. A limited or a sum certain of authority is not adequate. Nick v. Morgan's Foods, Inc., 270 F.3d 590 (8th Cir. 2001). 2
08cv1329

1

Case 3:08-cv-01329-W-AJB

Document 4

Filed 07/25/2008

Page 3 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

2.

A specific and current demand for settlement addressing all relief or remedies sought. If a specific demand for settlement cannot be made at the time the brief is submitted, then the reasons therefor must be stated along with a statement as to when the plaintiff(s) will be in a position to state a demand; and

3.

A brief description of any previous settlement negotiations, mediation sessions or mediation efforts.

Defendant(s) must submit a settlement brief to chambers, through counsel where applicable, by e-mail to [email protected] and serve it on all other counsel and any unrepresented parties by September 2, 2008. Defendant(s) brief must include the following: 1. A brief description of the defendant(s) position concerning plaintiff(s) allegations, any defenses and any counter-claims or set-offs asserted; 2. A specific and current response to plaintiff(s) demand and the defendant(s) specific offer of settlement; and, 3. A brief description of any previous settlement negotiations, mediation sessions or mediation efforts. General statements that a party will "negotiate in good faith" is not a specific demand or offer contemplated by this Order. It is assumed that all parties will negotiate in good faith. The briefs are limited to five (5) pages and must not include exhibits, attachments, or incorporate by reference the pleadings on file or other material. Request for Continuance or to Vacate ENE date Absent extraordinary circumstances, a request to continue the ENE will not be considered unless submitted via a joint motion to continue the date no less than fourteen days prior to the scheduled conference. Any request to continue the conference or request for relief from any of the provisions or requirements of this Order must be sought by a written joint motion. The joint motion must be supported by a declaration of counsel setting forth the reasons and justifications for the relief requested; 3
08cv1329

Case 3:08-cv-01329-W-AJB

Document 4

Filed 07/25/2008

Page 4 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

confirm compliance with Civil Local Rule 26.1; and, report the position of opposing counsel or any unrepresented parties subject to the Order. If the case is settled in its entirety before the scheduled date of the conference, counsel and any unrepresented parties must still appear in person, unless a joint motion to vacate a conference date due to the complete settlement of the case is submitted no less than 24 hours before the scheduled conference. Future Proceedings In the event the case does not settle at the Early Neutral Evaluation Conference, and where the parties have not yet held the Rule 26(f) conference or made initial disclosures, the parties shall also be prepared to discuss the following matters at the conclusion of the conference: 1. Any anticipated objections under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1)(E) to the initial disclosure provisions of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1)(A-D); 2. 3. The scheduling of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) conference; The date of initial disclosure and the date for lodging the discovery plan following the Rule 26(f) conference; and, 4. The scheduling of a Case Management Conference pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b). The Court will issue an appropriate order addressing these issues and setting dates as appropriate. Questions regarding this case may be directed to the Judge's chambers at (619) 557-3446. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: July 24, 2008 Hon. Anthony J. Battaglia U.S. Magistrate Judge United States District Court

K:\COMMON\BATTAGLI\CASES\2 Orders to be filed\08cv1329 ene.wpd

4

08cv1329