Free Motion for Leave to File - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 126.3 kB
Pages: 4
Date: May 15, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 840 Words, 5,372 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/8690/434-1.pdf

Download Motion for Leave to File - District Court of Delaware ( 126.3 kB)


Preview Motion for Leave to File - District Court of Delaware
Case 1 :04-cv-01338-JJF Document 434 Filed 05/15/2006 Page 1 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. and )
HONEYWELL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES INC., )
)
Plaintiff, )
) C.A. N0. 04-1338 (KAJ)
v. )
)
APPLE COMPUTER, INC., et al., )
)
Defendants. )
HONEYWELL’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY
IN OPPOSITION TO ARIMA DISPLAY’S MOTION TO DISMISS
FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION
Plaintiffs Honeywell International Inc. and Honeywell Intellectual Properties Inc.,
(collectively, "Honeywell") hereby move this Court for leave to file the attached Sur-Reply
regarding defendant Arima Display’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, which
addresses new information which Arima Display first submitted in its Reply Brief. In the wake
of the Court’s decision on ST—LCD’s similar Motion, Honeywell requested that Arima Display
dismiss its Motion, without prejudice, and engage in jurisdictional discovery. Arima Display
rejected Honeywell’s request. Arima Display’s position has thus necessitated the instant request,
in order that the Court may have a full record for evaluating Honeywell’s request for
jurisdictional discovery.
Specifically, on April I7, 2006, Arima Display filed a Reply Brief in Support of
its Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction. Accompanying Arima Display’s Reply
was a "Supplemental Declaration" of Mr. Hsing—Hung Shen which disclosed, for the frst time,
the identities and "locations" of Arima Display’s four U.S.-based customers. Honeywell’s initial
research into Arima Display’s newly disclosed customers indicates that at least two of them

Case 1:04—cv—01338-JJF Document 434 Filed 05/15/2006 Page 2 of 4
appear to be Delaware corporations, a third might be a Delaware corporation, and a fourth
appears to be in the process of expanding its already existing Delaware sales operations.
The Local Rules of this Court state that "[t]he party filing the opening brief shall
not reserve material for the reply brief which should have been included in a full and fair
opening brief" D. Del. LR. 7.1.3(c)(2). Because Arima Display reserved information relevant
to detennining personal jurisdiction until after the time for filing Honeywell’s Opposition had
passed, Honeywell moves the Court for leave to file the attached Sur-Reply, which provides
additional, jurisdictionally-relevant facts. (Okerlund Aff, Ex. A) (Sur-Reply).l
MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP
‘%f’>¢~ M
Thomas C. Gri (#1098)
OF COUNSEL: Leslie A. Polizoti (#4299)
1201 North Market Street
Martin R. Lueck P.O. Box 1347
ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER Wilmington, DE 19899-1347
& CIRESI L.L.P. (302) 658-9200
2800 LaSalle Plaza [email protected]
800 LaSalle Avenue [email protected]
Minneapolis, MN 55402-2015 Attorneys for Plaintwfs
(612) 349-8500
May 15, 2006
520413
I All Exhibits to the instant Motion including the proposed Sur-Reply are attached to the
Affidavit of Michael D. Okerlund in Support of P1aintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Sur-
Reply in Opposition to Arima Disp1ay’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal
Jurisdiction, tiled herewith.
2

Case 1:04—cv—01338-JJF Document 434 Filed 05/15/2006 Page 3 of 4
CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO RULE 7.1.1.
The undersigned counsel for Honeywell hereby certifies that counsel for
Honeywell spoke with counsel for Arima Display regarding the foregoing motion and
counsel for Arima Display indicated that he was not at this time in a position to agree to
the motion.
Dated: May 15, 2006 l E ; '
Thomas . rimm (#1098)
520455

Case 1:04—cv—01338-JJF Document 434 Filed 05/15/2006 Page 4 of 4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on May 15, 2006, I electronically tiled the foregoing
document with the Clerk of Court using CM/ECF, which will send notification of such filing to
the following: John R. Alison, Parker H. Bagley, Robert J. Benson, Robert Karl Beste, III,
Elizabeth L. Brann, John M. Caracappa, Christopher E. Chalsen, Arthur G. Connolly, III,
Frederick L. Cottrell, III, Francis DiGiovanni, Thomas M. Dunham, Amy Elizabeth Evans, York
M. Faulkner, Christopher J. Gaspar, Alexander E. Gasser, Alan M. Grimaldi, Thomas C. Grimm,
Thomas Lee Halkowski, Richard L. Horwitz, Dan C. Hu, John T. Johnson, Robert J.
Katzenstein, Nelson M. Kee, Richard D. Kelly, Stephen S. Korniczky, Hamilton Loeb, Robert
Maier, David J. Margules, David Ellis Moore, Carolyn E. Morris, Arthur I. Neustadt, Elizabeth
A. Niemeyer, Kevin M. O’Brien, Gerard M. O’Rourke, Andrew M. Ollis, Karen L. Pascale,
Adam Wyatt Poff, Leslie A. Polizoti, Alana A. Prills, Steven J. Rizzi, Avelyn M. Ross, Philip A.
Rovner, Diana M. Sangelli, Robert C. Scheinfeld, Carl E. Schlier, John M. Seaman, Chad
Michael Shandler, John W. Shaw, Neil P. Sirota, Monte Terrell Squire, William J. Wade,
Roderick B. Williams and Edward R. Yoches.
I also certify that on May 15, 2006, I caused to be served true and correct copies
of the foregoing on the following as indicated:
BY HAND: BY FEDERAL EXPRESS:
William J. Wade Dan C. Hu
RICHARDS LAYTON & FINGER TROP PRUNER & HU, P.C.
One Rodney Square, P.O. Box 551 8554 Katy Freeway
Wilmington, DE 19899-0551 Houston, TX 77024-1834

tgrimm @mnat.c0m