Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply - District Court of California - California

Case 3:08-cv-01140-JM-RBB

Document 8

Filed 07/29/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
KLINEDINST PC 501 WEST BROADWAY, STE. 600 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92101

Heather L. Rosing, Bar No. 183986 Gregor A. Hensrude, Bar No. 226660 KLINEDINST PC 501 West Broadway, Suite 600 San Diego, California 92101 (619) 239-8131/FAX (619) 238-8707 [email protected] Attorneys for Defendants SCOTT WAAGE; THE WAAGE LAW FIRM and ROBERT JENSEN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TJRK, INC., a California corporation; JOSEPH CHRISTENSON, an individual; and PATRICIA CHRISTENSON, an individual, Plaintiffs, v. SCOTT WAAGE, an individual; THE WAAGE LAW FIRM, a California professional corporation; JERRY WAAGE, an individual; PROVERBIAL INVESTMENTS, INC., an Iowa corporation; ROBERT JENSEN, an individual; INDIANAPOLIS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, an AMERUS COMPANY, nka AVIVA USA CORPORATION, an Iowa corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants. Case No. 08-cv-1140 JM (RBB)

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Judge: Jeffrey T. Miller Magistrate Judge: Complaint Filed: June 25, 2008 Trial Date: None set

Plaintiffs TJRK, INC., JOSEPH CHRISTENSON, and PATRICIA CHRISTENSON ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants SCOTT WAAGE; THE WAAGE LAW FIRM and ROBERT JENSEN ("Waage Defendants") hereby move as follows: /// ///
-1JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 08-cv-1140 JM (RBB)

Case 3:08-cv-01140-JM-RBB

Document 8

Filed 07/29/2008

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
KLINEDINST PC 501 WEST BROADWAY, STE. 600 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92101

On June 25, 2008, Plaintiffs filed a Complaint against the Waage Defendants, among others, before this Court. It was served on the Waage Defendants on July 10, 2008. Defense counsel was recently retained and received a copy of the complaint, which they are currently evaluating. As a result of the recent retention, the Waage Defendant's counsel requires additional time to evaluate and respond to the Complaint on behalf of the Waage Defendants. Plaintiffs and the Waage Defendants therefore jointly move the Court to extend the deadline for the Waage Defendants to file a responsive pleading to Wednesday, August 13, 2008. IT IS SO STIPULATED. BUTTERFIELD SCHECHTER LLP

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

DATED: July 29, 2008

By: /s/ Susan Meter SUSAN METER Attorneys for Plaintiffs

KLINEDINST PC

DATED: July 29, 2008

By: /s/ Gregor A. Hensrude GREGOR A. HENSRUDE Attorneys for Defendants SCOTT WAAGE; THE WAAGE LAW FIRM and ROBERT JENSEN

668158v1

-2JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 08-cv-1140 JM (RBB)

Case 3:08-cv-01140-JM-RBB

Document 8-2

Filed 07/29/2008

Page 1 of 3

Case 3:08-cv-01140-JM-RBB

Document 8-2

Filed 07/29/2008

Page 2 of 3

Case 3:08-cv-01140-JM-RBB

Document 8-2

Filed 07/29/2008

Page 3 of 3