Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1 :04-cv-01338-JJF Document 1 105 Filed 07/30/2008 Page 1 of 2
BOUCHARD MARGULES 8 FRIEDLANDER
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
SUITE I 4OO
222 DELAWARE AVENUE
Wu.M|Nc·r0N, ILAWARE IQBOI
57:a-ssoo
FAX <:ao2> evo-sson
DAVID J. MAncun.Es DMECT DIAL
<:ao2> 573-3530
DMARGULES@BMF·LAW.COM
July 30, 2008
VIA CM/ECF FILING
The Honorable Joseph J. Farnan, Jr.
United States District Court
V For the District of Delaware
844 North King Street ‘
Wilmington, DE 19808
Re: Honeywell international, Inc., et al. v. Apple Computer, Inc., et al.
C.A. No. 04-1338-JJF (Consolidated)
Dear Judge Farnan:
We write on behalf of Defendants Citizen Watch Co., Ltd. and Citizen Displays Co., Ltd.
(collectively "Citizen") in the above-referenced matter. At the April 2, 2008 hearing, the Court
granted Citizen immediate leave to iile a Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement.
Citizen tiled its Motion on April 25, 2008, Honeywell tiled its Counter-Statement of Material
Facts on June 2, 2008, and Citizen iiled its Response to the Honeywell’s Counter-Statement on
June 27, 2008. Citizen’s Motion has now been fully briefed in accordance with the Court’s
posted Summary Judgment Procedures.
We understood the Court to have instructed the parties jointly to submit possible hearing
dates for the Court’s approval. Exhibit A, p. 20, lines 16-18. Honeywell is unwilling to do so,
stating it does not believe oral argument is consistent with Your Honor’s standing order.
We respectfully request oral argmnent and are generally available at the Court’s
convenience.
Resp_§tfully submitted,
Ekéfdakrw lx
(Bar No. 2254)
{BMP-wo1o2911.} I

Case 1 :04-cv—01338-JJF Document 1105 Filed 07/30/2008 Page 2 of 2
The Honorable Joseph J. Faman, Jr.
July 30, 2008
Page 2
cc: Clerk of the Court (by CM/ECF)
All Counsel of Record (by CM/ECF)
{Bw-wo1o2911.}