Free Notice of Document Discrepancy and Order Thereon - District Court of California - California

Case 3:08-cr-02032-JLS

Document 25

Filed 08/08/2008

Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES CASE NO.: E-FILED DATE: DOCUMENT TITLE: DOCUMENT FILED BY: 08-CR-2032-JLS CASE TITLE: USA v. Gastelum 08/07/2008 DOCUMENT NO.: 24 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages and Pretrial Motions (Docketed as Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages only) Defendant

Upon the electronic filing of the above referenced document(s), the following discrepancies are noted:
Local Rule or Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual provision ("ECF")

Discrepancy

ECF § 2(h) X ECF § 2(a), (g) ECF § 2(g) ECF § 2(f) Civ. L. Rule 5.1 Crim. L. Rule 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 Crim. L. Rule 32.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 Crim. L. Rule 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 Crim. L. Rule 47.1

Includes a proposed order or requires judge's signature Docket entry does not accurately reflect the document filed Multiple pleadings in one docket entry not separated out as attachments Lacking proper signature Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation Date noticed for hearing not in compliance with rules/Document(s) are not timely Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support as a separate document Briefs or memoranda exceed length restrictions Supplemental documents require court order

X

OTHER: Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages and Pretrial motions should have been filed separately. Also, each pretrial motion must be included in the docket entry.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The document is accepted despite the discrepancy noted above. Any further non-compliant documents may be stricken from the record. X The document is rejected. It is ordered that the Clerk STRIKE the document from the record and serve a copy of this order on all parties. Defendant is granted leave to file his pretrial motions in excess of the page limit and is further granted leave to file the motions on August 8, 2008, one day beyond the time period for filing.

Counsel is advised that any further failure to comply with the Local Rules or Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual may lead to penalties pursuant to Civil Local Rule 83.1. DATED: August 8, 2008 Honorable Janis L. Sammartino United States District Judge