Free Discrepancy Order Rejecting Document - District Court of California - California

Case 3:08-cv-00965-BEN-LSP

Document 10

Filed 08/14/2008

Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER THEREON CASE NO.: TITLE: E-FILED DATE: 08cv965 BEN(LSP Mabry v. Scribner 08/12/08 MOTION to Dismiss L E Scribner DOCKET NO.: 8

DOCUMENT TITLE: DOCUMENT FILED BY:

Upon the electronic filing of the above referenced document(s), the following discrepancies are noted: x Civil Local Rule or Discrepancy
Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual provision ("ECF")

ECF § 2(h) Includes a proposed order or requires judge's signature ECF § 2(a), (g) Docket entry does not accurately reflect the document(s) filed X ECF § 2(g) Multiple pleadings in one docket entry not separated out as attachments ECF § 2(f) Lacking proper signature Civ. L. Rule 5.1 Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Date noticed for hearing not in compliance with rules/document(s) are not timely Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support as a separate document Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Briefs or memoranda exceed length restrictions Civ. L. Rule 7.1 Missing table of contents and/or table of authorities Civ. L. Rule 15.1 Amended pleading not complete in itself OTHER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The document is accepted despite the discrepancy noted above. Any further non-compliant documents may be stricken from the record. The document is rejected. It is ordered that the Clerk STRIKE the document from the record, and serve a X copy of this order on all parties. Counsel is advised that any further failure to comply with the Local Rules or Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual may lead to penalties pursuant to Civil Local Rule 83.1.

Chambers of Judge Benitez (NP) 08/14/08