Free Mail Returned - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:04-cv-01328-G|\/IS Document 79 F1|ed 01/29/2008 Page 1 013
1 1 g i
1 E h Cj
1 ¤· 2 E.
1 UE - F;
~ 1 5* N 9 Qu
I-in @3
Q 5 = vn an
1 2 5 1** Ei F?
1 é 2. iff 2 2.
1 1 S 2 sz =¤ 1-;
1 1./ /5}} ms 2 2 ¤ E; ~
= W 0 ' H4 ¤> 1-1 :. O
on 1 1***
1 1-M G Q} rp
1 1;% Q E
= ¤“1 ` Q
· 1 I-* G =
cb °‘° ·-1
- 1 ~ Q E2 "`
` · :`YZ:f{` fJ;·`»;», $
' .
"Z¤:~ ?» V?} 1
1 -. *11 11 1 1
1 11;; zi as 1g
1 ?·§§ § pu
1 $11 1 P 2. 5*
` m1; " U S g
1 W1 [TJ ¤ :
1 Wk ,...1 g
gw ~¤ .
rg 1 ·~O 2**
¤- 11; 11
1- U
m r·<
1 1, ···~=·——·-··. 5 .. 1
1 112 z 1
` U il-5 Q? 1 .. -· -·~V 1 H 1 I
LE- a+ E 1 mm 1
1 it g JAN 29 12
Q 5. g 3 Q ...1, ET
.. __ _,._, . - -1—» ··r?_;_”;·‘fQQ11`.·§— _ gu
1 `-E: G CWB U_§_Bi?.\{?’i\Ui:7§‘* j
’1 L 3 $@3: E `1 ¤1S ¤ t 1/ 1 11
1 2- EE gg; -¤ 1 11 if
1 F m mmz
. Z .° 9
1 E .1 .1 m 1
= G ' D
1 5 » wm ” 1
1 5 'ggfég 1
·.. ¤ *1
: 1*3 S as 2
l E.! ?! A?*}{11vcspus1.j
E ez me 0 .1
] 5: g g. G g
1 E' as sg 1; @1 ji?
:“ B {'L E"? 3*
2... F R U <¤> c1; Q3
1 :· iv 11.; 1111 F1 ;— ·1;1_ vg
1 ; no in A 1% R1
w 3 11*112 ’
1 ` 1 1 I__1

Case 1 :04-cv-01328-GMS Document 79 Filed O1/29/2008 Page 2 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
_ FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
JAMES HALL, )
Plaintiff, l
v. l Civ. Action No. 04-1328-GMS
DAVID HOLMAN, et al., l
Defendants. g I
ORDER
WHEREAS, on July 13, 2007, the court entered an order, dated July 12, 2007, dismissing
the case with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4l(b) for want of prosecution (D.I. 70);
WHEREAS, on August 23, 2007, the plaintiff] James Hall ("Hall"), filed a notice of
appeal of thelluly 12, 2007 order (D1. 71.); 1 _ H U _ _ q
I WHEREAS, pursuant-to App_._P. 4(a)(-l), the time for ainotice-of appeal is
within thirty days after the judgment or order appealed- from is entered; n U l I l
WHEREAS, on the same date Hall tiled his notice of appeal, he submitted a letter to the
court explaining that he was belatedly given, by the pretrial law library, a notice of appeal and
packet, indicating that the law librarian would "concur the facts" and requesting consideration
that he not be penalized (presumably for filing the late notice of appeal) (D.I. 72);
WHEREAS, considering the foregoing, the court construes the letter (D.I. 72) as a motion
for an extension of time to tile a late notice of appeal and finds that Hall has demonstrated good
cause for the late tiling as required by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)(A)(ii);
at Wilmingtonnthis ldlay of December, 2007, IT IS that
the motionnfor an extension of time to file a-notice of appeal (D.l. 72) is-CRANTED and n

Case 1:04-cv-01328-G|\/IS Document 79 Filed 01/29/2008 Page 3 of 3
notice of appeal is deemed tiled as of the date this order is granted pursuant to Fed. R. App. P.
4(¤)($)(C)-
I .
cms , UN so smtss s stmt: @»oE
F I L E D
DEC T 9 fi"?
¤%$aii!$‘3*é%E‘ti§°»BE§E
-2-