Free Order - District Court of California - California


File Size: 21.0 kB
Pages: 3
Date: June 5, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 680 Words, 4,207 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/casd/270616/4.pdf

Download Order - District Court of California ( 21.0 kB)


Preview Order - District Court of California
Case 3:08-cv-00867-W-LSP

Document 4

Filed 06/05/2008

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
"Full authority to settle" means that the individuals at the settlement conference must be authorized to fully explore settlement options and to agree at that time to any settlement terms acceptable to the parties. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 648 (7th Cir. 1989). The person needs to have "unfettered discretion and authority" to change the settlement position of a party. Pitman v. Brinker Intl., Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 485-486 (D. Ariz. 2003). The purpose of requiring a person with unlimited settlement authority to attend the conference includes that the person's view of the case may be altered during the face
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 08-0867-W(LSP) NOTICE AND ORDER FOR EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION CONFERENCE

GARY LITCHENBERG, Plaintiff, v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that an Early Neutral Evaluation of your case will be held on August 5, 2008, at 2:00 PM before United States Magistrate Judge Leo S. Papas, United States Courthouse, Courtroom G, First Floor, 940 Front Street, San Diego, California. Pursuant to Rule 16.1(c) of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, both counsel and the parties who have full and unlimited authority1 to

1

08cv0867

Case 3:08-cv-00867-W-LSP

Document 4

Filed 06/05/2008

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

negotiate and enter into a binding settlement shall appear in person at the conference and shall be prepared to discuss the claims, defenses and damages. Unless there are extraordinary circumstances, persons

required to attend the conference pursuant to this Order shall not be excused from personal attendance. Requests for excuse from

attendance for extraordinary circumstances shall be made in writing at least 48 hours prior to the conference. Where the suit involves

the United States or one of its agencies, only counsel for the United States with full settlement authority need appear. All

conference discussions will be informal, off the record, privileged and confidential. The parties may submit a short Confidential Early Neutral Evaluation Conference Statement prior to the conference. The

parties are also encouraged to lodge with Magistrate Judge Papas' chambers a chronology, setting forth a timeline of the factual events that are the basis for the claims and defenses asserted in this litigation. If submitted, the chronology should be in a chart

or column format with the column headings "DATE" and "EVENT" and may be annotated with documents significant to the facts or issues. In the event the case does not settle at the Early Neutral Evaluation Conference, the parties shall also be prepared to discuss the following matters at the conclusion of the conference. 1. Procedure Any anticipated objections under Federal Rule of Civil 26(a)(1)(E) to the initial disclosure provisions of

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1)(A-D);

to face conference. Id. at 486. A limited or a sum certain of authority is not adequate. Nick v. Morgan's Foods, Inc., 270 F.3d 590 (8th Cir. 2001).

2

08cv0867

Case 3:08-cv-00867-W-LSP

Document 4

Filed 06/05/2008

Page 3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED:

2.

The scheduling of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

26(f) conference; 3. The date of initial disclosure and the date for lodging

the discovery plan following the Rule 26(f) conference; and, 4. The scheduling of a Case Management Conference pursuant

to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b). The Court will issue an appropriate order addressing these issues and setting dates as appropriate. Plaintiff's counsel shall notify all Defendants of the date and time of the Early Neutral Evaluation Conference. Questions

regarding this case may be directed to the Magistrate Judge's research attorney at (619) 557-6384.

June 5, 2008

Hon. Leo S. Papas U.S. Magistrate Judge

3

08cv0867