Free Proposed Order - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1 :04-cv-01325-SLR Document 30 Filed 1.0/28/2005 Page 1 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
In re:
PEREGRJNE SYSTEMS, INC., Q gl.,
Debtors.
)
AW Treuhand G1:nbI·I )
Wirtschaftspruflmgsgesellschaft )
Steuerberaumgsgesellschaft, )
formerly known as Arthur Andersen )
Wirtschaftsp1·tifL1ngsgesellscha& )
Steuerberaumgsgesehschatt mbH, )
· )
Appellant, )
)
v. ) C.A. No. 04-1325 (SLR)
)
Peregine Systems, Inc., )
)
Appellee. )
STIPULATED ORDER TO STAY BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION BASED ON AN TICIPATED SETTLEMENT
WHEREAS On October ll, 2005, Appellant AW Treuhand GMBH
Wirtschaftsprtiftmgsgesellschait Steuerberattmgsgesellschaft, formerly known as Arthur
Andersen Wirtschaftsprtifttngsgesellschaft Steuerberanmgsgesellschaft mbI—I ("AWT") filed its
I motion for reconsideration (the "Motion") of this Court’s September 29, 2005 Order (the
“Order"), and
WHEREAS AWT and Appellee, Peregrine Litigation Trust as successor in interest to
Peregrine Systems, Inc., stipulate that the motion should not be considered or further briefed
because it will likely become moot upon the final documentation and court approval of a pending
{130457049; 2; .

Case 1:04-cv-01325-SLR Document 30 Filed 10/28/2005 Page 2 ot 4
class settlement. If for any reason the settlement is not finalized and approved, the parties will
notify the Court and negotiate a reasonable brienng schedule;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval ofthe Court, as
follows:
1. All matters pertaining to this appeal shall be stayed until the settlement is
consummated or upon further order of the Court. Appellee shall not be required to file a
response to the Motion at this time. ‘
2. If the settlement is not consummated by March 31, 2006, then the parties shall notify
the Court as to the status of the settlement process or request the Court to set an appropriate
response deadline for the Response to the Motion.
3. The Appellee will not use or seek to enforce the Order in any way until the Court has
ruled on the Motion (if necessary).
4. The Appellee agrees that it will not use or enforce the Court’s September 29, 2005
Order in any way until the Court has ruled on Appellanfs Motion.
Dated: October 28, 2005
YETTER & WARDEN, LLP
R. Paul Yetter, Esq.
Autry W. Ross, Esq.
909 Fannin, Suite 3600
Houston, TX 77010
Counsel for Appellee PEREGRJNE
SYSTEMS, INC.
-aHd.
2
@.0457049; 2}

Case 1:04-cv-01325-SLR Document 30 Filed 10/28/2005 Page 3 ot 4
REED SMITH LLP
Kurt F. Gwynne, Esq. . 3951)
Kimberly E.C. Lawson, Esq. (No. 3966)
1201 Market Street, Suite 1500
Wilmington, DE 19801-1163
(302) 778-7500
Local Counsel for Appellee PEREGRINE
SYSTEMS, INC.
FERRY, JOSEPH Sc PEARCE, P.A.
§l
Theodore J. Taoconelli (No. 2678)
824 Market Street, Suite 904
P.O. Box 1351
Wilmington, DE 19899
(302) 575-1555
..g;nd..
Paul E. Summit, Esq.
Sullivan & Worcester LLP
One Post Oiitiee Square
Boston MA 02109
(617) 338-2800
..3116..
Utz P. Toepke, Esq.
Law Ofnee of Utz P. Toepke
70 W. Red Oak Lane
White Plains, NY 10604
(914)697-4791
..g_nd-
3
{no4s·m4¤; 2}

Case 1 :04-cv-01325-SLR Document 30 Filed 10/28/2005 _ Page 4 of 4
John Morrell, Esq.
Higgs, Fletcher & Mack LLP
401 West "A" Street, Suite 2600
San Diego, CA 92101
(619) 236-1551
Attorneys for Appellant AW Treuhand
GmbH Wirtschaitspriiftmgsgesehschait
Steuerberauingsgesellschafc,
formerly known as Arthur Andersen
Wirtschaftspriiftmgsgesellschaft
Steuerberattmgsgesellschaft mbH
Dated: 0
· SO ORDERED:
The Honorable Sue L. Robinson, Chief Judge
United States District Court
4
@0457040; 2}