Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer - District Court of California - California


File Size: 127.1 kB
Pages: 2
Date: May 22, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 316 Words, 1,989 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/casd/269239/7.pdf

Download Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer - District Court of California ( 127.1 kB)


Preview Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer - District Court of California
Case 3:08-cv-00776-LAB-BLM

Document 7

Filed 05/22/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 complaint in this action is EXTENDED in accordance with the terms as outlined in the joint 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1motion. (Docket no. 5, ΒΆ 4.) The joint motion requested reassignment of this case to Judge Janis Sammartino as a related case. Judge Sammartino, however, on May 20, 2008 issued an order explaining she is declining to accept reassignment of this and other related cases due to the pending motion for The parties have jointly moved to extend time to answer and to waive service of process. The joint motion also requests reassignment of this case, and appointment of lead counsel for all the reassigned cases. For good cause, Defendants' time to answer, move, or otherwise plead in response to the vs. REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC., REDDY ICE CORPORATION, ARCTIC GLACIER INCOME FUND, ARCTIC GLACIER INC., ARCTIC GLACIER INTERNATIONAL INC., AND HOME CITY ICE COMPANY, et. al. Defendants. GASLAMP COUNTRY CLUB, LLC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff CASE NO. 08-CV-00776-LAB-BLM UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ORDER GRANTING JOINT REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, AND STIPULATION WAIVING SERVICE; AND DENYING REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT AND APPOINTMENT

Case 3:08-cv-00776-LAB-BLM

Document 7

Filed 05/22/2008

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4

consolidation and transfer before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. The request for reassignment is therefore DENIED. The joint motion's request to appoint the law firms of Coughlin Stoia Gellar Rudman & Robbins, LLP, Scott + Scott LLP and Robbins Umeda & Fink, LLP as lead counsel in the

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2reassigned actions is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 5-21-08 _________________________________ Hon. Larry A. Burns United States District Judge