Free Motion to Continue - District Court of California - California

Case 3:08-cv-00655-WQH-LSP

Document 27

Filed 07/17/2008

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
DLA P IPER US LLP
SAN DIEGO

EVAN R. CHESLER (pro hac vice) PETER T. BARBUR (pro hac vice) ELIZABETH L. GRAYER (pro hac vice) CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP 825 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10019 Telephone: (212) 474-1000 Facsimile: (212) 474-3700 WILLIAM S. BOGGS (Bar No. 053013) BRIAN A. FOSTER (Bar No. 110413) TIMOTHY S. BLACKFORD (Bar No. 190900) DLA PIPER US LLP 401 B Street, Suite 1700 San Diego, CA 92101-4297 Telephone: (619) 699-2700 Facsimile: (619) 699-2701 Attorneys for Defendant QUALCOMM INCORPORATED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JESSE MEYER, an individual, on his own behalf and on behalf of all similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation, Defendant. Defendant QUALCOMM Incorporated ("Qualcomm"), in accordance with Civil Local Rules 7.2 and 12.1, jointly moves the Court with Plaintiff Jesse Meyer ("Meyer") to enter an Order continuing until August 4, 2008, the return date on Qualcomm's Motion to Dismiss Meyer's Complaint. Pursuant to ordinary operation of Civil Local Rule 7.1(e)(3), this will extend until July 28, 2008, Qualcomm's deadline for filing its Reply in Further Support of its Motion to Dismiss. In support of this joint motion, Qualcomm states as follows: 1. Meyer filed his Complaint on April 10, 2008, and subsequently served the Complaint on Qualcomm on April 11, 2008. -1WEST\21471919.1

Case No. 08cv0655-WQH (LSP) JOINT MOTION PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 7.2 FOR CONTINUANCE OF QUALCOMM'S MOTION TO DISMISS Judge: Hon. William Q. Hayes

08cv0655-WQH (LSP)

Case 3:08-cv-00655-WQH-LSP

Document 27

Filed 07/17/2008

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
DLA P IPER US LLP
SAN DIEGO

2. Qualcomm filed its Motion to Dismiss on June 2, 2008. 3. On June 26, 2008, Meyer moved jointly with Qualcomm for an Order continuing Qualcomm's Motion to Dismiss until July 28, 2008. The joint motion was granted. 4. Meyer does not oppose the request for an additional continuance. 5. This extension will allow Qualcomm sufficient opportunity to reply to the arguments made in Meyer's Opposition to Qualcomm's Motion to Dismiss. 6. This Court has the authority, "for good cause shown", to order an extension of time "with or without motion or notice". Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1). WHEREFORE, for good cause shown, Qualcomm respectfully requests the Court to enter an Order continuing until August 4, 2008, the return date on Qualcomm's Motion to Dismiss Meyer's Complaint and, pursuant to ordinary operation of Civil Local Rule 7.1(e)(3), extending until July 28, 2008, Qualcomm's deadline for filing its Reply in Further Support of its Motion to Dismiss. Dated: July 17, 2008 DLA PIPER US LLP By /s/ Timothy S. Blackford [email protected] CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP Evan R. Chesler Peter T. Barbur Elizabeth L. Grayer Attorneys for Defendant QUALCOMM INCORPORATED ///// ///// ///// ///// ///// ///// -2WEST\21471919.1

08cv0655-WQH (LSP)

Case 3:08-cv-00655-WQH-LSP

Document 27

Filed 07/17/2008

Page 3 of 3

1 2

Dated: July 17, 2008

KAMBEREDELSON, LLC By /s/ Alan Himmelfarb

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
DLA P IPER US LLP
SAN DIEGO

[email protected] KAMBEREDELSON, LLC Jay Edelson Ethan Preston ABBEY SPANIER RODD & ABRAMS, LLP Karin E. Fisch Orin Kurtz Attorneys for Plaintiff JESSE MEYER

Certification regarding signatures: I hereby attest that all of the signatories to this document have approved its content.

By:

/s/ Timothy S. Blackford

-3WEST\21471919.1

08cv0655-WQH (LSP)