Free Answer to Complaint - District Court of California - California

Case 3:08-cv-00489-W-CAB

Document 3-2

Filed 03/24/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Hugh A. McCabe, SBN 131828 David P. Hall, SBN 196891 NEIL, DYMOTT, FRANK, MCFALL & TREXLER A Professional Law Corporation 1010 Second Avenue, Suite 2500 San Diego, CA 92101-4959 P 619.238.1712 F 619.238.1562 Attorneys for Defendants FRIJOUF, RUST & PYLE, P.A. and ROBERT F. FRIJOUF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) FRIJOUF, RUST & PYLE, P.A., a Florida ) Professional Association, ROBERT F. FRIJOUF, an individual, and does 1 through 50 ) ) inclusive, ) ) Defendants. PURE BIOSCIENCE, a California Corporation, CASE NO. 08 CV 0489 W CAB DECLARATION OF PROOF OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, am employed in the county of San Diego, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action; my business address is 1010 Second Avenue, Suite 2500, San Diego, California, 92101. On March 24, 2008, I caused to be served the following document(s) described as follows: 1. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF;

on the parties in this action by placing a true copy in a sealed envelope addressed as follows:

1
08-CV-0489 W CAB

Case 3:08-cv-00489-W-CAB

Document 3-2

Filed 03/24/2008

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
08-CV-0489 W CAB

Charles E. Brumfield, Esq. 1725 Gillespie Way El Cajon, CA 92020 619.596.8600 x 138 Phone 619.596.8790 Fax

BY MAIL - As follows: I am "readily familiar" with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at San Diego, California in the ordinary course of business. The envelope was sealed and placed for collection and mailing on this date following our ordinary practices. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. BY CERTIFIED MAIL, Return Receipt Requested - As follows: I am "readily familiar" with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at San Diego, California in the ordinary course of business. The envelope was sealed and placed for collection and mailing on this date following our ordinary practices. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. The envelope was sent Certified, return receipt requested. BY FAX - As follows: I personally sent to the addressee's telecopier number a true copy of the above-described documents. Thereafter I sent a true copy in a sealed envelope addressed and mailed as indicated above. Executed on March 24, 2008, at San Diego, California. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that the above is

true and correct. //s//Hugh A. McCabe Hugh A. McCabe