Free Discrepancy Order Accepting Document - District Court of California - California


File Size: 17.1 kB
Pages: 1
Date: March 19, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 324 Words, 2,064 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/casd/264885/7.pdf

Download Discrepancy Order Accepting Document - District Court of California ( 17.1 kB)


Preview Discrepancy Order Accepting Document - District Court of California
Case 3:08-cv-00412-L-JMA

Document 7

Filed 03/19/2008

Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER THEREON CASE NO.: 08cv412-L (JMA) CASE TITLE: B.M. v. Encinitas Union School District E-FILED DATE: 3/18/2008 DOCKET NO.: 5 DOCUMENT TITLE: Motion for Preliminary Injunction for "Stayput Placement" DOCUMENT FILED BY: Plaintiff Upon the electronic filing of the above referenced document(s), the following discrepancies are noted: x
Civil Local Rule or Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual provision ("ECF")

Discrepancy

ECF 2(h) ECF 2(a), (g) X X ECF 2(g) ECF 2(f) Civ. L. Rule 5.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 Civ. L. Rule 15.1 X IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: X

Includes a proposed order or requires judge's signature Docket entry does not accurately reflect the document(s) filed Multiple pleadings in one docket entry not separated out as attachments Lacking proper signature Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation Date noticed for hearing not in compliance with rules/Document(s) are not timely Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support as a separate document Briefs or memoranda exceed length restrictions Missing table of contents Amended pleading not complete in itself OTHER: Motion contains a second, separate motion as an attachment. Also, attachment #1 is a duplicate of the main document.

The document is accepted despite the discrepancy noted above. Any further non-compliant documents may be stricken from the record. The document is rejected. It is ordered that the Clerk STRIKE the document from the record, and serve a copy of this order on all parties.

Counsel is advised that any further failure to comply with the Local Rules or Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual may lead to penalties pursuant to Civil Local Rule 83.1.

DATED: March 19, 2008

M. James Lorenz United States District Court Judge