Free Answer to Counterclaim - District Court of California - California


File Size: 20.0 kB
Pages: 5
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 1,043 Words, 6,483 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/casd/261325/24.pdf

Download Answer to Counterclaim - District Court of California ( 20.0 kB)


Preview Answer to Counterclaim - District Court of California
Case 3:08-cv-00060-BTM-CAB

Document 24

Filed 03/11/2008

Page 1 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

MELODY A. KRAMER, SBN 169984 9930 Mesa Rim Road, Suite 1600 San Diego, California 92121 Telephone (858) 362-3150 email: [email protected] J. MICHAEL KALER, SBN 158296 9930 Mesa Rim Road, Suite 200 San Diego, California 92121 Telephone (858) 362-3151 email: [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff JENS ERIK SORENSEN, as Trustee of SORENSEN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT TRUST UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JENS ERIK SORENSEN, as Trustee of ) Case No. 08cv00060 BTM CAB SORENSEN RESEARCH AND ) DEVELOPMENT TRUST, ) ) REPLY TO COUNTERCLAIM OF Plaintiff ) RIDGE TOOL COMPANY v. ) ) EMERSON ELECTRIC CO., a Missouri ) corporation; ONE WORLD ) TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware ) corporation; RIDGE TOOL COMPANY, ) an Ohio corporation; RIDGID, INC., a ) Delaware corporation; and ) DOES 1 ­ 100 ) ) Defendants. _________________________________ and related counterclaims.

Case 3:08-cv-00060-BTM-CAB

Document 24

Filed 03/11/2008

Page 2 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Plaintiff/Counterdefendant Jens Erik Sorensen as Trustee of Sorensen Research and Development Trust ("SRDT"), hereby responds to the specific paragraphs of the Counterclaims of Defendant/Counterclaimant Ridge Tool Company1: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. On information and belief, admit. Admit. Admit that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction; otherwise, deny. Admit that this Court has personal jurisdiction over the parties; Admit that venue is proper; otherwise, deny. Admit. Admit. FIRST COUNTERCLAIM FOR DECLARATION OF NONINFRINGEMENT 8. 9. 10. SRDT realleges and incorporates by reference its responses to Admit that Counterclaimant is attempting to allege an action under the Deny. SECOND COUNTERCLAIM FOR DECLARATION OF PATENT INVALIDITY paragraphs 1-7, above, as though fully set forth herein. Federal Declaratory Judgments Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202.

otherwise, deny.

To clarify, three identical documents entitled "Emerson Electric Co.'s, Ridge Tool Company's, and Ridgid, Inc.'s Response to Complaint for Patent Infringement and Affirmative Defenses and Ridge Tool Company's Counterclaims" were filed on behalf of each of those defendants separately at Docket Nos. 19, 21, and 22. Although the wording and form of filing of these documents is ambiguous as to who is filing a counterclaim, Plaintiff's counsel was advised by letter from Defendant's counsel that the Counterclaim is being filed only on behalf of Ridge Tool Company. Based upon that representation, this Reply only responds to that Defendant. 2.
Case No. 08cv00060 BTM CAB

1

Case 3:08-cv-00060-BTM-CAB

Document 24

Filed 03/11/2008

Page 3 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

11. 12. 13. 14. 15.

SRDT realleges and incorporates by reference its responses to Admit. Deny. Admit that Counterclaimant is attempting to allege an action under the Deny.

paragraphs 1-10, above, as though fully set forth herein.

Federal Declaratory Judgments Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202.

WHEREFORE, SRDT prays that judgment on Emerson's Cross-Complaint be entered as follows: a. relief; b. c. d. That this case is decreed an "exceptional case" and SRDT is awarded For costs of suit herein incurred; For such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. reasonable attorneys' fees by the Court pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285; For judgment in favor of SRDT and against Emerson on all requested

DATED this 11th day of March, 2008. JENS ERIK SORENSEN, as Trustee of SORENSEN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT TRUST, Plaintiff /s/ Melody A. Kramer Melody A. Kramer, Esq. J. Michael Kaler, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff

3.

Case No. 08cv00060 BTM CAB

Case 3:08-cv-00060-BTM-CAB

Document 24

Filed 03/11/2008

Page 4 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Orlando F. Cabanday HENNELLY & GROSSFELD LLP 4640 Admiralty Way, Suite 850 Marina del Rey, CA 90292 Telephone: (310) 305-2100 Facsimile: (310) 305-2116 [email protected] PERSON(S) SERVED Roger G. Perkins, Esq Angela Kim, Esq. MORRIS POLICH & PURDY LLP 501 West Broadway, Suite 500 San Diego, California 92101 [email protected] [email protected]

PROOF OF SERVICE I, Melody A. Kramer, declare: I am and was at the time of this service working within in the County of San Diego, California. I am over the age of 18 year and not a party to the within action. My business address is the Kramer Law Office, Inc., 9930 Mesa Rim Road, Suite 1600, San Diego, California, 92121. On Tuesday, March 11, 2008 , I served the following documents:
REPLY TO COUNTERCLAIM OF RIDGE TOOL COMPANY

PARTY(IES) SERVED One World Technologies, Inc.

METHOD OF SERVICE Email - Pleadings Filed with the Court via ECF

Emerson Electric Co., Ridge Tool Co., and Ridgid, Inc.

Email - Pleadings Filed with the Court via ECF

(Personal Service) I caused to be personally served in a sealed envelope hand-delivered to the office of counsel during regular business hours. (Federal Express) I deposited or caused to be deposited today with Federal Express in a sealed envelope containing a true copy of the foregoing documents with fees fully prepaid addressed to the above noted addressee for overnight delivery. (Facsimile) I caused a true copy of the foregoing documents to be transmitted by facsimile machine to the above noted addressees. The facsimile transmissions were

Case 3:08-cv-00060-BTM-CAB

Document 24

Filed 03/11/2008

Page 5 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

reported as complete and without error. (Email) I emailed a true copy of the foregoing documents to an email address represented to be the correct email address for the above noted addressee. (Email--Pleadings Filed with the Court) Pursuant to Local Rules, I electronically filed this document via the CM/ECF system for the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. (U.S. Mail) I mailed a true copy of the foregoing documents to a mail address represented to be the correct mail address for the above noted addressee.

X

I declare that the foregoing is true and correct, and that this declaration was executed on Tuesday, March 11, 2008, in San Diego, California. /s/ Melody A. Kramer Melody A. Kramer

2.

Case No. 08cv00060 BTM CAB