Free Order - District Court of California - California


File Size: 16.9 kB
Pages: 1
Date: August 8, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 342 Words, 2,153 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/206436/8.pdf

Download Order - District Court of California ( 16.9 kB)


Preview Order - District Court of California
Case 3:08-cv-04000-JSW

Document 8

Filed 08/08/2008

Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER THEREON CASE NO.: 08cv499-L(WMC) CASE TITLE: Martinez v. Fidelity Nat'l Financial, Inc. et al. E-FILED DATE: 8/7/08 DOCKET NO.: 7 DOCUMENT TITLE: Unopposed Motion to Transfer Venue DOCUMENT FILED BY: Plaintiff Upon the electronic filing of the above referenced document(s), the following discrepancies are noted: x
Civil Local Rule or Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual provision ("ECF")

Discrepancy

ECF § 2(h) ECF § 2(a), (g) ECF § 2(g) ECF § 2(f) Civ. L. Rule 5.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 X Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 Civ. L. Rule 15.1 ECF § 2(g) X Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a)

Includes a proposed order or requires judge's signature Docket entry does not accurately reflect the document(s) filed Multiple pleadings in one docket entry not separated out as attachments Lacking proper signature Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation Date noticed for hearing not in compliance with rules/Document(s) are not timely Lacking notice of motion and motion as a separate document Briefs or memoranda exceed length restrictions Missing table of contents and table of authorities Amended pleading not complete in itself Should have been filed as an attachment OTHER: Insufficient proof of service: lacking service list; service by e-filing insufficient for defendants who have not yet appeared (ECF § 2(d)).

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The documents are accepted despite the discrepancy noted above. Any further non-compliant documents may be stricken from the record. The documents are rejected. It is ordered that the Clerk STRIKE the documents from the record, and serve a copy of this order on all parties. Counsel is advised that any further failure to comply with the Local Rules or Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual may lead to penalties pursuant to Civil Local Rule 83.1. DATED: August 8, 2008 X

M. James Lorenz United States District Court Judge