Free Stipulation and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR - District Court of California - California


File Size: 18.2 kB
Pages: 3
Date: August 29, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 497 Words, 3,195 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/206029/31.pdf

Download Stipulation and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR - District Court of California ( 18.2 kB)


Preview Stipulation and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR - District Court of California
Case 4:08-cv-02781-SBA

Document 31

Filed 08/29/2008

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Nathan Lane III (State Bar No. 50961) Joseph A. Meckes (State Bar No. 190279) Xavier M. Brandwajn (State Bar No. 246218) SQUIRE, SANDERS & DEMPSEY L.L.P. One Maritime Plaza, Third Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: 415.954.0200 Facsimile: 415.393.9887 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant TOKUYAMA CORPORATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION TOKUYAMA CORPORATION, Case No. C 08-02781 SBA STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS [ADR Local Rule 3-5(c)(1)] Defendant.

12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 VISION DYNAMICS, LLC, 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
SQUIRE, SANDERS & DEMPSEY L.L.P.
600 Hansen Way Palo Alto, California 94304

VISION DYNAMICS, LLC, Counterclaimant, vs. TOKUYAMA CORPORATION, Counterclaim Defendant.

STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
CASE NO. C 08-02781 SBA

Case 4:08-cv-02781-SBA

Document 31

Filed 08/29/2008

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

STIPULATION The parties stipulate to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: __ Arbitration __ ENE __ Mediation

(Use space below to provide any information regarding timing of session, preferred subject matter expertise of neutral, or other issues.) Private Processes: X Private ADR (please identify process and provider)

8 The parties will engage in private mediation with a mutually agreeable private mediator 9 no later than January 16, 2009. To the extent the Court grants defendant's pending motion to 10 stay further proceedings, the parties agree to engage in private mediation with a mutually 11 agreeable private mediator no later than 60 days after the Court lifts the stay. 12 (For e-filers, please consult General Order N., 45, Section X regarding signatures.) 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
SQUIRE, SANDERS & DEMPSEY L.L.P.
600 Hansen Way Palo Alto, California 94304

Dated: August 29, 2008

SQUIRE, SANDERS & DEMPSEY L.L.P. By: /s/ Joseph A. Meckes Joseph A. Meckes Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant TOKUYAMA CORPORATION

Dated: August 29, 2008

MEYERTONS HOOD KIVLIN KOWERT & GOETZEL PC By: /s/ Dwayne K. Goetzel Dwayne K. Goetzel Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant VISION DYNAMICS, LLC

-1STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
CASE NO. C 08-02781 SBA

Case 4:08-cv-02781-SBA

Document 31

Filed 08/29/2008

Page 3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
SQUIRE, SANDERS & DEMPSEY L.L.P.
600 Hansen Way Palo Alto, California 94304

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 I, Joseph A. Meckes, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on August 29, 2008. By: _/s/ Joseph A. Meckes_______________ Joseph A. Meckes

ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September ___, 2008 HON. SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-2STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
CASE NO. C 08-02781 SBA