Free Answer to Complaint - District Court of California - California


File Size: 19.8 kB
Pages: 4
Date: April 9, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 1,310 Words, 8,228 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/205774/11.pdf

Download Answer to Complaint - District Court of California ( 19.8 kB)


Preview Answer to Complaint - District Court of California
Case 3:08-cv-00891-MEJ

Document 11

Filed 04/09/2008

Page 1 of 4

1 EDMUND G. BROWN JR. Attorney General of the State of California 2 RANDALL P. BORCHERDING Supervising Deputy Attorney General 3 KAREN W. YIU, State Bar No. 230710 Deputy Attorney General 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 4 San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 Telephone: (415) 703-5385 5 Fax: (415) 703-5480 Email: [email protected] 6 7 Attorneys for Defendant Employment Development Department 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 The Employment Development Department ("EDD") hereby submits its answer to the v. JESUS MARQUEZ, OLGA MARQUEZ, RAMON MARQUEZ, JUANITA MARQUEZ, TAQUERIA LOS PRIMOS, TAQUERIA LOS PRIMOS NO. 2, LUIS GALINDO, MARTHA GALINDO, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., STATE OF CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, STATE OF CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, SAN MATEO COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR, Defendants. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, C08-0891 CW DEFENDANT EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT'S ANSWER TO COMPLAINT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

24 allegations of the Complaint as follows: 25 1. Answering the allegations of paragraphs 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 13, the EDD admits the

26 allegations. 27 2. Answering the allegations of paragraphs 2, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 21, 22, 24,

28 25, 27, 28, 31, 33, 35, 37 and 38, the EDD lacks sufficient information or belief to answer the
Defendant EDD's Answer to Complaint United States of America v. Jesus Marquez, et al. C08-0891 CW

1

Case 3:08-cv-00891-MEJ

Document 11

Filed 04/09/2008

Page 2 of 4

1 allegations and, basing its denial on that ground, denies each and every allegation in of 2 paragraphs 2, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 27, 28, 31, 33, 35, 37 and 38 of 3 the Complaint. 4 3. Answering the allegations of paragraph 9, the EDD admits that the property subject to

5 the suit is 791 South Johnston Street, Half Moon Bay, California 94019. Except as expressly 6 admitted herein, the EDD lacks sufficient information or belief to answer the remaining 7 allegations, and, basing its denial on that ground, denies the remaining allegations. 8 4. Answering the allegation of paragraph 17, the EDD incorporates its respective prior

9 answers to paragraphs 1 through 16 as though fully set forth in this answer. 10 5. Answering the allegations of paragraph 20, the EDD incorporates its respective prior

11 answers to paragraph 1 through 19 as though fully set forth in this answer. 12 6. Answering the allegations of paragraph 23, the EDD incorporates its respective prior

13 answers to paragraph 1 through 22 as though fully set forth in this answer. 14 7. Answering the allegations of paragraph 26, the EDD incorporates its respective prior

15 answers to paragraph 1 through 25 as though fully set forth in this answer. 16 8. Answering the allegations of paragraph 29, the EDD incorporates its respective prior

17 answers to paragraph 1 through 28 as though fully set forth in this answer. 18 9. Answering the allegations of paragraph 30, the EDD admits the allegations beginning

19 on line 27 with the words "Pursuant to 26" and ending on line 1 with the words "Jesus and Olga 20 Marquez." Except as expressly admitted herein, the EDD lacks sufficient information or belief 21 to answer the remaining allegations in paragraph 30, and, basing its denial on that ground, denies 22 each and every remaining allegation. 23 10. Answering the allegations of paragraph 32, the EDD admits the allegations beginning

24 on line 6 with the words "Pursuant to 26" and ending on line 8 with the words "Ramon and 25 Juanita Marquez." Except as expressly admitted herein, the EDD lacks sufficient information or 26 belief to answer the remaining allegations in paragraph 32, and, basing its denial on that ground, 27 denies each and every remaining allegation. 28 11. Answering the allegations of paragraph 34, the EDD admits the allegations beginning
United States of America v. Jesus Marquez, et al. C08-0891 CW

Defendant EDD's Answer to Complaint

2

Case 3:08-cv-00891-MEJ

Document 11

Filed 04/09/2008

Page 3 of 4

1 on line 13 with the words "Pursuant to 26" and ending on line 15 to 16 with the words "Jesus 2 Marquez and Ramon Marquez." Except as expressly admitted herein, the EDD lacks sufficient 3 information or belief to answer the remaining allegations in paragraph 34, and, basing its denial 4 on that ground, denies each and every remaining allegation. 5 12. Answering the allegations of paragraph 36, the EDD admits the allegations beginning

6 on line 20 with the words "Pursuant to 26" and ending on line 22 to 23 with the words "Jesus 7 Marquez and Ramon Marquez." Except as expressly admitted herein, the EDD lacks sufficient 8 information or belief to answer the remaining allegations in paragraph 36, and, basing its denial 9 on that ground, denies each and every remaining allegation. 10 11 1. WHEREFORE, defendant EDD, prays for the following relief: That the tax liens of the United States be foreclosed against the real property of Jesus

12 Marquez, Olga Marquez, Ramon Marquez and Juanita Marquez and the real property sold. 13 2. That this Court determine the relative priorities of the liens of the lienholder parties to

14 this suit and order payment of the tax liens of the Employment Development Department from 15 the proceeds of the foreclosure sale of the real property of defendants Jesus Marquez, Olga 16 Marquez, Ramon Marquez and Juanita Marquez. 17 3. 18 4. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
40231015.wpd

That the Employment Development Department be granted its costs. For such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. Dated: April 9, 2008 Respectfully submitted, EDMUND G. BROWN JR. Attorney General of the State of California RANDALL P. BORCHERDING Supervising Deputy Attorney General /s/ Karen W. Yiu KAREN W. YIU Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendant Employment Development Department

28

SF2008400747

Defendant EDD's Answer to Complaint

United States of America v. Jesus Marquez, et al. C08-0891 CW

3

Case 3:08-cv-00891-MEJ

Document 11

Filed 04/09/2008

Page 4 of 4

DECLARATION OF SERVICE BY U.S. MAIL Case Name: No.: United States of America v. Jesus Marquez, et al.

C08-0891 CW

I declare: I am employed in the Office of the Attorney General, which is the office of a member of the California State Bar, at which member's direction this service is made. I am 18 years of age or older and not a party to this matter. I am familiar with the business practice at the Office of the Attorney General for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service. In accordance with that practice, correspondence placed in the internal mail collection system at the Office of the Attorney General is deposited with the United States Postal Service that same day in the ordinary course of business. On April 9, 2008, I served the attached DEFENDANT EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT'S ANSWER TO COMPLAINT by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid, in the internal mail collection system at the Office of the Attorney General at 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000, San Francisco, CA 94102-7004, addressed as follows: David L. Denier United States Attorney's Office - San Francisco Tax Division, 9th Floor 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 San Francisco, CA 94102 Robert A. Goldstein Attorney at Law 100 Bush Street, Suite 501 San Francisco, CA 94104 Cindy Lan Ho Law Office of Robert L. Goldstein 100 Bush Street, Suite 501 San Francisco, CA 94104-3908 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on April 9, 2008, at San Francisco, California. Eugene Whitlock San Mateo County Counsel's Office 400 County Center, 6th Floor Redwood City, CA 94063 Ralph Roberts Employment Development Department Special Procedures Section, MIC 92S P.O. Box 826880 Sacramento, CA 94280-0001

Sylvia S. Wu Declarant
40239377.wpdBY

/s/ Sylvia S. Wu Signature