Free Stipulation - District Court of California - California

Case 3:08-cv-00995-PJH

Document 18

Filed 08/19/2008

Page 1 of 3

1 DAVID FINK (pro hac vice pending) 7519 Apache Plume 2 Houston, TX 77071 Tel. (713) 729-4991 3 Fax. (713) 729-4951 Email: [email protected] 4 DUNCAN M. MCNEILL (SBN 136416) 5 1514 Van Dyke Avenue San Francisco, CA 94124 6 Tel. (415) 752-5063 [email protected] 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff , 8 JAMES B. GOODMAN 9 10 11

Michael J. Bettinger (State Bar 122196) Timothy P. Walker, Ph.D. (State Bar 105001) K & L Gates 55 Second Avenue, Suite 1700 San Francisco, CA 94105 Tel. (415) 882-8200 Fax. (415) 882-8220 [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Defendant ETRON TECHNOLOGY AMERICA, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) v. ) ) ETRON TECHNOLOGY AMERICA, ) INC. ) ) Defendant. __________________________________ ) CASE NO. CV-08-00995 PJH STIPULATED CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL The Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton

12 JAMES B. GOODMAN, 13 14 15 16 17 18

James B. Goodman and Etron Technology America, Inc. through their respective 19 attorneys, hereby file this stipulated conditional dismissal. 20 The parties, in good faith, agree and believe that an agreement in principle has 21 been reached, and will be put into written form within thirty (30) days. 22 Therefore, in an effort to minimize judicial resources and to minimize the 23 expenses and costs to the parties, it is hereby stipulated that: 24 1. 25 days of the Order signed by the Court, each party bearing its own fees and 26 27 28
1
STIPULATED CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL JAMES B. GOODMAN V. ETRON TECHNOLOGY AMERICA CASE NO. CV-07-CV-5498 PJH

This action be conditionally dismissed without prejudice for thirty (30)

Case 3:08-cv-00995-PJH

Document 18

Filed 08/19/2008

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 3. 2.

costs. During the aforementioned thirty (30) day period, either party may request the Court to reopen the case. If, after the expiration of the aforementioned thirty (30) day period, no party has submitted a request to reopen to the Court, then it is hereby stipulated that this case be dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees and costs. For the foregoing reasons, the parties request the Court to accept this Stipulation

9 and the proposed Order submitted herewith. 10 11 Date: August 19, 2008 /s/ 12 13 14 Date: August 19, 2008 15 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED: 18 19 Date: 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
2
STIPULATED CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL JAMES B. GOODMAN V. ETRON TECHNOLOGY AMERICA CASE NO. CV-07-CV-5498 PJH

DAVID FINK Attorney for James B. Goodman

/s/ MICHAEL J. BETTINGER Attorney for Etron Technology America, Inc.

Phyllis J. Hamilton U.S. District Court Judge

Case 3:08-cv-00995-PJH

Document 18

Filed 08/19/2008

Page 3 of 3

1 2

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 I, David Fink, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been

3 obtained from the other signatory. I declare, under penalty of perjury, under the laws of 4 the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed August 19, 5 2008 at Houston, TX. 6 7 8 /s/ 9 David Fink 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
3
STIPULATED CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL JAMES B. GOODMAN V. ETRON TECHNOLOGY AMERICA CASE NO. CV-07-CV-5498 PJH