Free Order - District Court of California - California

Case 3:08-cr-00407-JSW

Document 8

Filed 08/27/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CASBN 44332) United States Attorney BRIAN J. STRETCH (CASBN 163973) Chief, Criminal Division JEFFREY R. FINIGAN (CASBN 168285) Assistant United States Attorney 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, California 94102 Telephone: (415) 436-7232 Facsimile: (415) 436-7234 Email: [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 13 14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 15 Plaintiff, 16 17 18 WILLIAM BENSON PEAVEY, JR., 19 Defendant. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The above-captioned matter came before the Court on August 21, 2008, for initial appearance. The defendant was represented by Anthony Brass, Esq., and the government was represented by Jeffrey Finigan, Assistant United States Attorney. The matter was continued to October 9, 2008, before this Court for scheduling pretrial motions and/or trial setting. The Court made a finding that the time from and including August 21, 2008, through and including October 9, 2008, should be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A), because the ends of justice served by taking such action outweighed the best
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXCLUDING TIME CR 08-0407 JSW

v.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Criminal No. CR 08-0407 JSW

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXCLUDING TIME

Case 3:08-cr-00407-JSW

Document 8

Filed 08/27/2008

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The finding was based on the need for the defendant to have reasonable time necessary for effective preparation and for continuity of counsel pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv). The parties hereby agree to and request that the case be continued until October 9, 2008, and that the exclusion of time until then be granted. The parties agree and stipulate that the additional time is appropriate and necessary under Title 18, United States Code, § 3161(h)(8)(A), because the ends of justice served by this continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. This time exclusion will allow defense counsel to effectively prepare, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, and will provide for continuity of counsel for the defendant.

DATED: 8/26/2008

/s/ ANTHONY J. BRASS Counsel for William Peavey

DATED: 8/26/2008

/s/ JEFFREY R. FINIGAN Assistant U.S. Attorney

So ordered. DATED: August 27, 2008 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXCLUDING TIME CR 08-0407 JSW

2