Free Declaration in Support - District Court of California - California


File Size: 15.8 kB
Pages: 2
Date: June 4, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 499 Words, 3,040 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/204121/5.pdf

Download Declaration in Support - District Court of California ( 15.8 kB)


Preview Declaration in Support - District Court of California
Case 3:08-cv-02763-MHP

Document 5

Filed 06/10/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

GILL SPERLEIN (172887) THE LAW FIRM OF GILL SPERLEIN 584 Castro Street, Suite 849 San Francisco, California 94114 Telephone: (415) 378-2625 Facsimile: (415) 252-7747 [email protected] Attorney for Plaintiff IO GROUP, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IO GROUP, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, vs. JOHN DOES 1 and 2, individuals, Defendants.

CASE NO.: 08-2763 (MHP) DECLARATION OF GILL SPERLEIN IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7-11 FOR DISCOVERY ORDER

I, GILL SPERLEIN, declare: 1. I am an attorney at law licensed to practice in the State of California and attorney of

record for Plaintiff Io Group, Inc. 2. The two defendants in the above-entitled action, JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2,

have not yet been identified.
25 26 27 28

3.

Plaintiff is in the process of attempting to identify JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE

2, and now seeks an order from the court allowing early discovery to aid in that process.

-1SPERLEIN DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST FOR EARLY DISCOVERY C-08-2763 (MHP)

Case 3:08-cv-02763-MHP

Document 5

Filed 06/10/2008

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3

4.

On behalf of Io Group, Inc. I served a subpoena on Ning, Inc. as authorized under

17 USC §512(h) requesting the ip addressed of the users who engaged in the infringing acts at issue in this matter. The Clerk of the Court issued the subpoena under the provisions of 17 U.S.C.

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

§ 512(h). The clerk opened a miscellaneous matter captioned In re Io Group, Inc., and assigned the number CV-08-80111-MISC (SI). 5. Ning has responded to the subpoena by providing ip addresses from which JOHN

DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2 accessed manplay.ning.com along with a corresponding times and dates. 6. I searched public data bases and learned that Road Runner (Time Warner Cable)

controls the ip address used by JOHN DOE 1 to access manplay.ning.com and that AT&T Internet Services controls the IP addresses used by DOE 2 to access manplay.ning.com. 7. I intend to serve subpoenas on AT&T and Road Runner (Time Warner Cable) in

15 16 17 18 19 20

order to obtain account holder information for the subscribers assigned those ip addresses. 8. By indentifying the subscribers assigned the ip addresses associated with the

infringing activity, plaintiff will be able to determine the names of the defendants previously identified as DOES 1 and 2. 9. I am aware of no other manner in which I could reliably obtain the identity of the

21 22 23 24 25 26

Doe Defendants. Pursuant to the laws of the United States, I declare under penalty of perjury the foregoing is true and correct. Dated: June 4, 2008 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Gill Sperlein

27 28

GILL SPERLEIN, Attorney for Plaintiff

-2SPERLEIN DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST FOR EARLY DISCOVERY C-08-2763 (MHP)