Free Order Referring Case to Early Neutral Evaluation - District Court of California - California

Case 5:08-cv-01769-JW

Document 21

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
PRASAD SHANKAR, CASE NO. CV 08 1769JW Plaintiff,
v.

HSBC, INC. and DOES 1 to 50, Defendants.
/

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Defendant's counsel and Plaintiff report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 35: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court D IEI D Processes: Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: I | Private ADR (please identify process and provider)

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: IXI the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.) I | other requested deadline

Dated: Dated:

8/12/08 8/12/08

I si Prasad Shankar Plaintiff Isl Robert J. Wilger Attorney for Defendant
American LegalNet, Inc. www.USCourtForms.com

Case 5:08-cv-01769-JW

Document 21

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 2 of 3

XXXXXXXX ORDER [PROPOSED]

Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: I | Non-binding Arbitration 0 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) X 1 I Mediation D Private ADR Deadline for ADR session IX I 90 days from the date of this order. n other

IT IS SO ORDERED.
August 18, 2008

Dated:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE JUDGE
Firmwide:86162727.1 023404.1053

American LegalNet, Inc. www.USCourtForms.com

Case 5:08-cv-01769-JW

Document 21

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 3 of 3

1 2 3

PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL I am employed in Santa Clara County, California. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within-entitled action. My business address is 50 West San Fernando Street, 15th Floor, San Jose, California 95113.2303. I am readily familiar with this firm's practice for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service. On August 12, 2008, I placed with this firm at the above address for deposit with the United States Postal Service a true and correct copy of the within document(s): STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS in a sealed envelope, postage fully paid, addressed as follows:

·4

5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23

Prasad Shankar 2701 East Brookshire, Apt. 201 Sioux Falls, SD 57103 Following ordinary business practices, the envelope was sealed and placed for collection and mailing on this date, and would, in the ordinary course of business, be deposited with the United States Postal Service on this date. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. Executed on August 12, 2008, at San Jose, California.

Oa^v./VN (J Jan M. Gaeden
Firmwide:85288514.1 023404.1053

24
25 26 27 28
LITTLER MENDELSON 50 Was! San Fernando Slieol tSih Floor San Jose. CA 95113 2303 4089984160

PROOF OF SERVICE