Free Stipulation - District Court of California - California


File Size: 40.3 kB
Pages: 4
Date: July 2, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 345 Words, 2,148 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/204084/9.pdf

Download Stipulation - District Court of California ( 40.3 kB)


Preview Stipulation - District Court of California
Case 3:08-cv-02834-JSW

Document 9

Filed 07/02/2008

Page 1 of 4

1 2 3 4

Law Offices of Nick V. Avtonomoff Nick V. Avtonomoff (State Bar #63713) 1701 Franklin Street San Francisco, CA 94109 (415) 380-0772/Fax 388-2161 Attorney for Plaintiff

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 SUSANA CROW, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On June 6, 2008, Defendant, BARNES & NOBLE BOOKSELLERS, INC., a Delaware corporation, Noticed Removal of said state court action, alleging that there was a complete diversity between plaintiff and defendant, and the amount in controversy exceeded the sum of $75,000. On March 13, 2008, Plaintiff, SUSANA CROW, filed a Complaint, in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda, Unlimited Jurisdiction, Case Number 08­376519. ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ) BARNES & NOBLE BOOKSELLERS, ) INC., and DOES 1-10, ) ) Defendants, ) ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CASE NUMBER C08 02834 EMC

STIPULATION OF NON-OPPOSITION TO REMOVAL

Case 3:08-cv-02834-JSW

Document 9

Filed 07/02/2008

Page 2 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

The Parties, SUSANA CROW and BARNES & NOBLE BOOKSELLERS, INC, by and through their attorneys of record, Stipulate as follows:

In the interests of judicial economy, plaintiff hereby stipulates that the removal of this action will not be opposed, and plaintiff will not bring a Motion to Remand. The parties to this action

hereby stipulate and agree that plaintiff's failure to oppose said removal, or make a remand motion at this time, shall not in any way prejudice plaintiff's right to make a remand motion at a later time in the action.

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

____________________________ Nick Avtonomoff Attorney for Plaintiff

____________________________ Melissa Bonfiglio Attorney for Defendant

2

Case 3:08-cv-02834-JSW

Document 9

Filed 07/02/2008

Page 3 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Case 3:08-cv-02834-JSW

Document 9

Filed 07/02/2008

Page 4 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4