Free Order - District Court of California - California

Case 3:08-cv-02824-PJH

Document 11

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 1 of 3

IJNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Prodiance Corporation

CASE NO. C 0802824 PJH

Plaintiff(s),
v.
Towers, Pen-in, Forster & Crosby, inc.

STIPULATION AND {PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Defendant(s).
______________________________________________________________/

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

Court Processes: Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 andADR L.R. 3-5)

Private Process: Private ADR (please ident[y process and provider) _______________________

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)

/

other requested deadline ______________________________________________________
Dated: 8/20/08

/5/ Vernon H. Granneman

Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: 8/20/08
Is! Matthew S. Kenefick

Attorney for Defendant

Case 3:08-cv-02824-PJH

Document 11

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 2 of 3

[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: Non-binding Arbitration Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)
Mediation

/

Private ADR

/

Deadline for ADR session

days from the date of this order. other
90

IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNIT ED

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

8/22/08 Dated:__________________

______________________________________

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

A

C

LI

FO

amilton UNITED STATESllDISTRICT y is J. H h Judge P

R NIA

O OR IT IS S

DERED

RT U O

NO

JUDGE

RT

H

Case 3:08-cv-02824-PJH

Document 11

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 3 of 3

I hereby attest that I have the concurrence of Matthew D. Kenefick to e-file this
document.

/5/ Vernon H. Granneman

Vernon H. Granneman

701230504v1