Free Stipulation - District Court of California - California

Case 3:08-cv-02575-SI

Document 23

Filed 06/09/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

BETH H. PARKER, SBN 104773 BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415-393-2556 Facsimile: 415-393-2286 [email protected] R. DANNY HUNTINGTON (PRO HAC VICE) B. JEFFERSON BOGGS (PRO HAC VICE) SUSAN BAKER MANNING, SBN 197350 TIMOTHY A MOLINO (PRO HAC VICE) BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP 2020 K Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20006-1806 Telephone: 202-373-6000 Facsimile: 202-373-6001 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff Ceravision, Limited

ROBERT C. MORGAN, SBN 46348 ROPES & GRAY LLP 1211 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 Telephone: 212-596-9000 Facsimile: 212-596-9090 [email protected] TERRY KEARNEY, SBN 160054 MATTHEW A. ARGENTI, SBN 240954 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: 650-493-9300 Facsimile: 650-565-5100 [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Defendant Luxim Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION CERAVISION LIMITED, Plaintiff v. LUXIM CORPORATION, CASE NO.: C 08-02575 SI CIVIL L.R. 6-1(a) STIPULATION EXTENDING THE TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

18 19 Defendant. 20 21

WHEREAS, defendant Luxim Corporation was served with the complaint in this action 22 on May 22, 2008 (Docket No. 7) and is required, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12, to respond to 23 that complaint by June 11, 2008; 24 WHEREAS, Luxim requests an extension until July 9, 2008 to respond to the complaint; 25 WHEREAS, plaintiff Ceravision Limited does not oppose Luxim's above-described 26 request for an extension of time; and 27 28
CIVIL L.R. 6-1(a) STIPULATION EXTENDING THE TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT CASE NO.: C 08-02575 SI

Case 3:08-cv-02575-SI

Document 23

Filed 06/09/2008

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

WHEREAS, the above-described change will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order; IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a), that the date by which Luxim must respond to Ceravision's complaint is extended from June 11, 2008 to July 9, 2008.

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI

By: /s/ Susan Baker Manning Susan Baker Manning Dated: June 9, 2008

By: /s/ Matthew A. Argenti Matthew A. Argenti Dated: June 9, 2008 Attorneys for Defendant Luxim Corporation

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
CIVIL L.R. 6-1(a) STIPULATION EXTENDING THE TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT CASE NO.: C 08-02575 SI

Attorneys for Plaintiff Ceravision Limited

Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(b) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from Susan Baker Manning. Dated: June 9, 2008 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI By: /s/ Matthew A. Argenti Matthew A. Argenti Attorneys for Defendant Luxim Corporation

-2-