Free Letter - District Court of California - California

Case 5:06-cv-01839-PVT

Document 75

Filed 02/16/2007

Page 1 of 1

SEAN P. DEBRUINE 650.838.2121/fax: 650.838.2001 [email protected]

February 16, 2007 Hon. Charles R. Breyer United States District Court for the Northern District of California 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102 Re: Elantech Devices Corp. v. Synaptics, Inc. et al. Case No. C06-01839 CRB

Dear Judge Breyer: In response to the Court's Order of February 14, 2007, plaintiff Elantech Devices Corp. hereby identifies the following four terms as those it would most like construed by the Court. The terms are taken from chart at Exhibit A to the parties' December 18, 2006 Joint Claim Construction Statement: 9. "initiating a signal to the host indicating the occurrence of said tap gesture" ('931); 10. "maintaining said signal for a predetermined period of time" ('931); 11. "detecting in which of at least one corner of the touch-sensor pad said tap gesture occurred" ('931); and 13. "incrementally move" ('411). Respectfully submitted, AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP /S/ Sean P. DeBruine Attorneys for Plaintiff Elantech Devices Corp.