Free Order - District Court of California - California


File Size: 39.0 kB
Pages: 2
Date: August 27, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 476 Words, 3,086 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/203676/31.pdf

Download Order - District Court of California ( 39.0 kB)


Preview Order - District Court of California
Case 3:08-cv-02611-SI

Document 31 30

08/27/2008 Filed 08/26/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
SQUIRE, SANDERS & DEMPSEY L.L.P.
One Maritime Plaza, Suite 300 San Francisco, California 941113492

David A. Gabianelli (State Bar No. 158170) Andrew L. Chang (State Bar No. 222309) SQUIRE, SANDERS & DEMPSEY L.L.P. One Maritime Plaza, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94111-3492 Telephone: +1.415.954.0200 Facsimile: +1.415.393.9887 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Attorneys for Defendant CENTIMARK CORPORATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)

PATRICK HANSEN, Plaintiff, vs. CENTIMARK CORPORATION, Defendant.

Case No. C-08-2611-SI Assigned to the Honorable Susan Illston STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT CENTIMARK CORPORATION'S TIME TO RESPOND TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiff Patrick Hansen ("Hansen") and Defendant CentiMark Corporation ("CentiMark") (collectively referred to as the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on June 4, 2008, CentiMark responded to Hansen's original complaint in this action by filing and serving its Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Transfer or Stay, currently set for hearing before this Court on September 22, 2008. WHEREAS, on August 14, 2008, Hansen filed and served an Amended Complaint in this action. WHEREAS, the Parties assume that Hansen's Amended Complaint moots the Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Transfer or Stay, currently pending before this Court. WHEREAS, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule 15(a)(3), CentiMark's response
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND DEF'S TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT CASE NO. C-08-2611-SI

Case 3:08-cv-02611-SI

Document 31 30

08/27/2008 Filed 08/26/2008

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
SQUIRE, SANDERS & DEMPSEY L.L.P.
One Maritime Plaza, Suite 300 San Francisco, California 941113492

to the Amended Complaint is due on or about August 28, 2008. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE AND STIPULATE that: (1) CentiMark's time to respond to Hansen's Amended Complaint shall be extended

to September 10, 2008. THE PARTIES SO STIPULATE. DATED: August 25, 2008 QUARLES & BRADY LLP

By:

/s/ Otto W. Immel Otto W. Immel

Attorneys for Plaintiff PATRICK HANSEN DATED: August 25, 2008 SQUIRE, SANDERS & DEMPSEY L.L.P.

By:

/s/ David A. Gabianelli David A. Gabianelli

Attorneys for Defendant CENTIMARK CORPORATION OF COUNSEL: Peter S. Russ Gregory J. Krock Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney One Oxford Centre 301 Grant St., 20th Floor Pittsburgh, PA 15219-1410 Telephone: +1.412.562.8800/Facsimile:

+1.412.562.1041

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

____________________

______________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Motion (docket #13) is moot and is terminated.

-2STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND DEF'S TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT CASE NO. C-08-2611-SI