Free Proposed Order - District Court of California - California


File Size: 37.4 kB
Pages: 2
Date: July 16, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 531 Words, 3,177 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/203127/15.pdf

Download Proposed Order - District Court of California ( 37.4 kB)


Preview Proposed Order - District Court of California
Case 3:08-cv-02334-SI

Document 15

Filed 07/16/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. C 08-02334 SI [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE PRO PER RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT FILED BY CORPORATE DEFENDANT INTELCOM, INC. Date: August 22, 2008 Time; 9:00 a.m. Ctrm: 10 Judge: Honorable Susan Illston

12 INTEL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiffs, 14 vs. 15 INTELCOM, INC., a Delaware corporation, 16 Defendants. 17 18

This matter comes before the Court on the Motion of Plaintiff Intel Corporation to strike the

19 pro per response filed by corporate defendant Intelcom, Inc. The Court, having reviewed and 20 considered the parties' respective briefing and arguments in this matter and all relevant factual 21 statements therein, hereby GRANTS Plaintiff's motion. 22 Defendant's response to the complaint is hereby stricken. Defendant is further ordered to

23 appear in this case through counsel and file a proper response to the Complaint within twenty (20) days 24 of the date of this Order. 25 26 Dated: 27 28
HOWREY, LLP

IT IS SO ORDERED Honorable Susan Illston United States District Court Judge
No. C 08-02334 SI [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Pro Per Response to Complaint Filed by Corporate Defendant
DM_US:21330450_2

Case 3:08-cv-02334-SI

Document 15

Filed 07/16/2008

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 4 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 5

PROOF OF SERVICE

) ) )

ss.:

I am employed in the County of San Mateo, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and 6 not a party to the within action. My business address is 1950 University Avenue, 4th Floor, East Palo Alto, California 94303. 7 On July 16, 2008, I served on the interested parties in said action the within: 8 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE PRO PER RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT FILED BY CORPORATE 9 DEFENDANT INTELCOM, INC. 10 by placing a true copy thereof in a sealed envelope(s) addressed as stated below and causing such envelope(s) to be deposited in the U.S. Mail at East Palo Alto, California. 11 12 Intelcom, Inc. c/o Kassi E. Tchankpa 13 1335 Dublin Road Suite 210-A 14 Columbis, OH 43215 15 X 16 17 18 I declare under penalty of perjury that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of 19 this Court at whose direction the service was made and that the foregoing is true and correct. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
HOWREY, LLP

(MAIL) I am readily familiar with this firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S. postal service on that same day in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than 1 day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit.

Executed on July 16, 2008, at East Palo Alto, California. Tammy Miller (Type or print name) /s/ Tammy Miller (Signature)

No. C 08-02334 SI [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Pro Per Response to Complaint Filed by Corporate Defendant
DM_US:21330450_2