Free Proposed Order - District Court of California - California

Case 3:08-cv-02108-JL

Document 20

Filed 05/28/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 ERIC YOTING, G. (SBNI9O1O4) ESQ. 2
J

4 5 6 7 8 9 l0 1l l2

l4l Stony Circle,Suite202 Santa Rosa, 95401 CA Telephone: .57 707 5.5005 Facsimile: .57 707 5.5395

LAW OFFICES ENC G. YOUNG' OF TheCourtvard

Attomeysfor Plaintiff RITA SIGLAIN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERII DISTRICT OF CALIF'ORNIA. SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

RITA SIGLAIN, Plaintiff,
.

l3 v

) ) ) )

Case CV-08-2108 No. JL PROPOSED ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND IN OPPOSITIONTO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY ACTION PENDING ARBITRATION

)

t t 6 COMMTINICATIONS, a Virginia t INC., c-o.ryoratioli.BEqT IMAGEMARKETING, i I 7 INC.,a California corporation, i l8 Defendants l
19 20 2I
) ) )

t 4 TRADER PUBLISHING C_OMPANY, J a DoMINIoN Yjtg{'fu_La4qqsbiu t l 5 ENTERPRIS_E$: a Yirginia IN_C.? t

qol?glal_igq !-A\DMARK

Date: July2,2008 Time: 9:30a.m. Courtroom: F Judge:The Honorable James Larson. Magistrate Judge

PlaintifflsRITA SIGLAIN's Motion for Declaratory InjunctiveRehefpursuant 28 and to

22 U.S.C.S 2201andFRCP65 cameon for hearing July 2,2008 in the UnitedStates on District 23 Courtfor theNorthernDistrict of Califomia,450GoldenGateAvenue,SanFranbisco. CA 24 94102, Courtroom l5thFloor,at 9:30a.m. in F, 25
Pursuant a Stipulation order filed on May 13, 2008,Defendant to and

26 ENTERPRISES' Motion to StayAction Pending Arbitrationalsocameon for 27 same time andplace. 28 t/t

Case 3:08-cv-02108-JL

Document 20

Filed 05/28/2008

Page 2 of 2

I

2
a J

papers, the movingandopposing the The Court,havingconsidered parties'respective ORDER: doeshereby of on papors records file in this matter,andon the arguments counsel, and to plaintiff s Motion for Declaratory Reliefpursuant 28 U.S.C.S 2201is GRANTED' is into entered by the partieson May 17,2005 The Courtfindsthatthe ArbitrationAgleement v. Armendariz Found-Health vnder unconscionable and bothprocedurally substantively Plaintiff against psychcareServices,24 Cal.4th83(2000),andits termsshouldnot be enforced RITA SIGLAIN. to plaintiff s Motion for InjunctiveReliefpursuant FRCP65 is alsoGRANTED.

4 5 6 7 8 9

which this has Defendant alreadytakenstepsto enforcethe Arbitration Agreement, Because and Plaintiff RITA SIGLAIN will sufferimmediate contract, 1 0 Courtfindsto be an unconscionable of the enforcement the l 1 ineparableharmif injunctive relief is not orderedby this Court to restrain

t 2 Arbitration Agteement. 13
l4 15 16 Arbitrationis Motion to StayAction Pending Defendant's In light of the foregoing, DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED

t 7 Dated:
18 19 U.S.DistrictCourt,No. Dist.Calif.

20 2l 22 23 24 25 26 27 28