Free Brief - District Court of California - California


File Size: 46.3 kB
Pages: 3
Date: May 27, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 796 Words, 4,895 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/202310/30.pdf

Download Brief - District Court of California ( 46.3 kB)


Preview Brief - District Court of California
Case 3:08-cv-01896-PJH

Document 30

Filed 05/27/2008

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Neil Gieleghem CSBN 107389 Gieleghem Law Office 1875 Century Park East, Suite 700 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: (310) 284-3252 Telecopier: (310) 284-3253 [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff Nicholas H. Parker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 TO THIS HONORABLE COURT, AND TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF 21 RECORD: 22 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff hereby objects to the Declaration of Scott M. 23 Moore attached to Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to 24 Dismiss, to the following extent and on the following grounds: 25 Paragraph/Page/Line Reference 26 ¶ 2, p. 1, lns. 17 - 23 27 28
1

NICHOLAS H. PARKER, an individual,

) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) SCOTT MICHAEL MOORE, an individual; ) MOORE INTERNATIONAL LAW OFFICES, ) A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, a ) California corporation; MOORE ) INTERNATIONAL LAW OFFICES, A ) PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, a business ) entity, form unknown; DOES 1 through 20, ) inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) )

CASE NO. 3:08-CV-01896-PJH Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton OBJECTIONS TO REPLY DECLARATION OF SCOTT M. MOORE Date: Time: Courtroom: Wednesday, June 4, 2008 9:00 a.m. Courtroom 3, 17th Floor

[Nb. Filed with Opposition to Motion to Dismiss and Objection to Pro Hac Vice Admission]

Objections Relevance; lack of foundation; hearsay.

OBJECTIONS TO DECLARATION OF SCOTT M. MOORE, CASE NO. 3:08-CV-01896-PJH

Case 3:08-cv-01896-PJH

Document 30

Filed 05/27/2008

Page 2 of 3

1 2

¶ 3, p. 1, ln. 23 - p. 2, ln. 3 ¶ 4, p. 2, lns. 4-10

Relevance; lack of foundation; hearsay. Relevance; lack of foundation; hearsay; best evidence. Relevance; lack of foundation; hearsay. Relevance; lack of foundation; hearsay. Relevance; lack of foundation; speculation; best evidence. Relevance; lack of foundation. Relevance; lack of foundation; hearsay. Relevance; hearsay; lack of foundation; speculation.

3 4 ¶ 5, p. 2, lns. 11-18 5 6 7 ¶ 7, p. 3, lns. 1-5 8 9 ¶ 8, p. 3, lns. 4-9. 10 11 12 ¶ 10, p. 3, ln. 15 - p. 4, ln. 2 13 14 ¶ 9, p. 3, lns. 10-14 ¶ 6, p. 2, lns. 19-23

Plaintiff respectfully requests that, at the hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, the 15 Court sustain the above objections and strike the evidence referenced above. 16 17 Dated: May 26, 2008 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
2

GIELEGHEM LAW OFFICE

s/ Neil Gieleghem Neil Gieleghem Attorneys for Plaintiff Nicholas H. Parker

OBJECTIONS TO DECLARATION OF SCOTT M. MOORE, CASE NO. 3:08-CV-01896-PJH

Case 3:08-cv-01896-PJH

Document 30

Filed 05/27/2008

Page 3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

PROOF OF SERVICE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ss. )

I am a resident of the State of California; over the age of 18 years; and not a party to the within action; and my business address is: 1875 Century Park East, Suite 300, Los Angeles, California 90067. On May 27, 2008 I served the foregoing document described as: OBJECTIONS TO REPLY DECLARATION OF SCOTT M. MOORE [] (BY MAIL ) By placing the true copies of the document(s) listed above in a sealed envelope, fully prepaid, addressed to the recipient(s) listed below. I am "readily familiar" with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with U.S. postal service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Los Angeles, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in said affidavit. (BY FAX) By transmitting, on this date, via facsimile, the document(s) listed above to the fax number(s) set forth above. (BY EXPRESS MAIL) By placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed Overnight Express envelope and affixing a pre-paid air bill, and causing the envelope to be delivered to an Overnight Express agent for delivery. (BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION) By transmitting via electronic mail the document(s) listed above to each recipient listed below (via PACER system). (BY PERSONAL SERVICE) I delivered such envelope by hand to the office of the addressee.

[] [ ]

15 16 [X ] 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [ ]

Scott Michael Moore, Esq. Moore International Law Offices, P.C. 45 Rockefeller Plaza, Suite 2000 (630 5th Avenue, Suite 2000) New York, New York 10111 Tel: (212) 322-3474 Fax: (212) 332-3475 [email protected] Attorneys for Defendants I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, and the United States of America, that the above is true and correct. Executed on May 26, 2008, in Los Angeles, CA. s/ Neil Gieleghem Neil Gieleghem

i

OBJECTIONS TO DECLARATION OF SCOTT M. MOORE, CASE NO. 3:08-CV-01896-PJH