Free Order on Motion to Consolidate Cases - District Court of California - California

Case 3:08-cv-01531-MHP

Document 13

Filed 06/17/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
COOLEY GODWARD LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW PALO ALTO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION MARIA SANTILLAN, et al. Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General of the United States; et al. Defendants; and, TERESA D. PADILLA, et al., Plaintiffs v. TOM RIDGE, Secretary of Homeland Security, et al., Defendants Case No. C-04-2686 MHP Case No. C-08-1531 MHP [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE THE SANTILLAN AND PADILLA CASES AND TO RE-CERTIFY THE CLASS Hearing Date: June 16, 2008 Time: 2:00 p.m. Courtroom: 15 Hon. Marilyn Hall Patel

771715 v1/PA

CASE NO. C-04-2686 MHP CASE NO. C-08-1531 MHP

Case 3:08-cv-01531-MHP

Document 13

Filed 06/17/2008

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
COOLEY GODWARD LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW PALO ALTO

On June 16, 2008, this Court held a hearing on the parties' Joint Motion to Consolidate the Santillan and Padilla Cases and to Re-certify the Class. Upon full consideration of all submitted papers and oral arguments in support of the Joint Motion, and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties' Joint Motion to Consolidate the Santillan and Padilla Cases and to Re-certify the Class is GRANTED as follows: 1. Padilla, et al. v. Ridge, et al., No. C-08-1531 MHP is hereby consolidated with Santillan, et al. v. Mukasey, et al., No. C-04-2686 MHP. 2. The previously certified classes in the Santillan and Padilla cases are decertified and a single class is certified as follows: All persons who have been or will be granted lawful permanent resident status prior to termination of this Stipulation by the EOIR, through the Immigration Courts or the BIA, and to whom the USCIS has failed to issue evidence of registration as a lawful permanent resident, with the exception that the class excludes the 34 named plaintiffs in Lopez-Amor v. U.S. Attorney General, No 04-CV-21685 (S.D. Fla.). IT IS SO ORDERED.

June 16 Dated: ____________________, 2008

UNIT ED

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

771715 v1/PA

1.

CASE NO. C-04-2686 MHP CASE NO. C-08-1531 MHP

A

C

LI

FO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE atel lyn H. P ge Mari Jud

R NIA

RD IS O O IT HallSPatel Hon. Marilyn
NO

ERED

RT U O

RT

H