Free Terminate Deadlines - District Court of California - California


File Size: 90.6 kB
Pages: 3
Date: July 9, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 511 Words, 3,091 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/202170/26.pdf

Download Terminate Deadlines - District Court of California ( 90.6 kB)


Preview Terminate Deadlines - District Court of California
Case 4:07-cv-05078-CW

Document 26

Filed 07/09/2008

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On June 18, 2008, the Court issued a Clerk's Notice Taking Motion Under Submission in which the Plaintiff was notified that his opposition to Defendants County of Alameda and Charles Plummer's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to FRCP 12( b)(6), or Alternatively, Motion for More Definite Statement would be due July 3, 2008. Plaintiff was warned that failure to timely file an v. JOHN ASHCROFT, et al., Defendants. / JOHN MILWITT, ORDER Plaintiff, FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA No. 07-05078 CW

opposition may result in dismissal this case for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff has not filed an opposition to the motion.

On June 23, 2008, Federal Defendants John Ashcroft and Albert Gonzales filed a Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion for More Definite Statement. Plaintiff's opposition to the Federal Accordingly

Defendants' motion is due July 17, 2008.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Federal Defendants' Motion to

Case 4:07-cv-05078-CW

Document 26

Filed 07/09/2008

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion for More Definite Statement will be decided on the papers, and the August 7, 2008, hearing is vacated. Plaintiff's written opposition to both Alameda County and

Charles Plummer motion to dismiss and the Federal Defendants' motion to dismiss will be due July 17, 2008. Failure by Plaintiff

to timely file an opposition to both motions will result in dismissal of this case for failure to prosecute. 7/9/08

9 Dated 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge

Case 4:07-cv-05078-CW

Document 26

Filed 07/09/2008

Page 3 of 3

1 2 3 MILWITT et al, 4 Plaintiff, 5 v. 6 ASHCROFT et al, 7 Defendant. 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 John Milwitt 1164 Solano Avenue #122 Albany, CA 94706

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case Number: CV07-05078 CW CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

/

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on July 9, 2008, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.

Neill Tai Tseng United States Attorney's Office 450 Golden Gate Avenue 9th Floor San Francisco, CA 94102 Rebecca S. Widen Haapala, Thompson & Abern LLP 1939 Harrison Street, Suite 800 Oakland, CA 94612 Dated: July 9, 2008 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Sheilah Cahill, Deputy Clerk

3