Case 4:97-cv-04014-SBA
Document 207
Filed 02/26/2008
Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
THOMAS M. HERLIHY (SBN 83615) JOHN T. BURNITE (SBN 162223) KELLY, HERLIHY & KLEIN LLP 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2500 San Francisco, California 94104-4217 Telephone: (415) 951-0535 Facsimile: (415) 391-7808 Attorneys for Defendant THE PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
P. PAUL STORRER, Plaintiff, vs. THE PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Massachusetts corporation, Defendant.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case No. C97-04014 MJJ OBJECTIONS TO/MOTION TO STRIKE DECLARATION OF MONTIE S. DAY
OBJECTIONS TO/MOTION TO STRIKE DECLARATION OF MONTIE S. DAY
CASE NO. C97-04014 M JJ
Case 4:97-cv-04014-SBA
Document 207
Filed 02/26/2008
Page 2 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Defendant The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company ("Paul Revere") objects, pursuant to Local Rule 7-5(b), to the Declaration of Montie S. Day regarding plaintiff's motion for related case. Mr. Day's Declaration should be stricken in whole or in part under L.R. 7-5(b). OBJECTIONS 1. The Declaration of Montie Day fails to show any personal knowledge with respect to
specific facts in Hangarter v. Provident Life, et al. 2. The Declaration of Montie Day consists of hearsay with respect to his recitation "facts
and law" in Hangarter. 3. The Declaration of Montie Day is misleading insofar as it suggests that Paul Revere
was the only defendant in Hangarter. 4. The Declaration of Montie Day (paras. 4, 5, and 6) is based on conclusions and
argument, and therefore those portions should be stricken. L.R. 7-5(b).
KELLY, HERLIHY & KLEIN, LLP
Date: February 26, 2008
By_________/s/_________________ John T. Burnite Attorneys for Defendant THE PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
E:\25165\P08.wpd
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
-1OBJECTIONS TO/MOTION TO STRIKE DECLARATION OF MONTIE S. DAY CASE NO. C97-04014 M JJ