Free Stipulation - District Court of California - California

Case 3:08-cv-01718-VRW

Document 26

Filed 04/25/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

WILLIAM BLUMENTHAL General Counsel JANICE L. CHARTER Colo. Bar No. 12750 DAVID M. NEWMAN Cal. Bar No. 54218 THOMAS DAHDOUH N.Y. Bar No. 2222370 Federal Trade Commission 901 Market Street, Suite 570 San Francisco, CA 94103 Phone (415) 848-5100/ Fax (415) 848-5184 [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, Case No. C08-1718-VRW v. NEXTCLICK MEDIA, LLC, et al., Defendants. STIPULATION FOR ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR FILING RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS AND PROPOSED ORDER

WHEREAS, Defendants Next Click Media, LLC's, Next Internet, LLC's, Kenneth Chan's and Albert Chen's (collectively, "Defendants") response to Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission's (the "FTC") Complaint is currently due on Monday, April 28, 2008; WHEREAS, the parties to this action have entered into an exchange of information with the intention of exploring the possibility of settlement of this matter; WHEREAS, the FTC is willing to extend the time for Defendants to file their responses to Plaintiff's Complaint in order to focus on settlement discussions; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the FTC and Defendants, through their respective counsel, that Defendants may have until June 30, 2008, to Case No. C08-1718-VRW ­ Stip. Extending Deadline for Responsive Pleadings Page 1

Case 3:08-cv-01718-VRW

Document 26

Filed 04/25/2008

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6

file and serve responsive pleadings to the Complaint.

Dated: 4/25/08_____________

/s/_________________________________ LEWIS ROSE D. REED FREEMAN MICHAEL C. LYNCH KELLEY DRYE & WARREN ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS /s/_________________________________ JANICE L. CHARTER DAVID M. NEWMAN THOMAS N. DAHDOUH ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

Dated: 4/25/08_____________ 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Dated: _____________________ 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. ____________________________________ VAUGHN R. WALKER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case No. C08-1718-VRW ­ Stip. Extending Deadline for Responsive Pleadings

Page Page 2