Free Initial Appearance - District Court of California - California

rev. 9/6/07

Case 5:08-cr-00169-JW Document DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL DEPUTY CLERK M AGISTRATE JUDGE MARTHA BROWN M INUTE ORDER MAGISTRATE JUDGE DATE
RICHARD SEEBORG
DEFENDANT

Clear Form

3

Filed 03/25/2008 ins): 13 minof 1 TOTAL TIME (m Page 1
REPORTER/FTR

FTR--11:08-11:12, 2:39-2:48
NEW CASE CASE NUMBER

3/25/08
AGE

CR08-00169JW
APPEARANCES CUST P/NP ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT PD. APPT. RET.

PAUL WAYNE FIFFY
U.S. ATTORNEY

Y
INTERPRETER

P

LARA VINNARD
FIN. AFFT SUBMITTED DEF ELIGIBLE FOR APPT'D COUNSEL

COUNSEL APPT'D

GARY FRY
PROBATION OFFICER PRETRIAL SERVICES OFFICER

ANTHONY GRANADOS
INITIAL APPEAR

PARTIAL PAYMENT OF CJA FEES STATUS OTHER ATTY APPT HEARING

PROCEEDINGS SCHEDULED TO OCCUR PRELIM HRG MOTION JUGM'T & SENTG ARRAIGNMENT BOND HEARING INITIAL APPEAR REV PROB OR S/R PROB. REVOC.

2 MIN
I.D. COUNSEL DETENTION HRG

2 MIN
ID / REMOV HRG

9 MIN
CHANGE PLEA INITIAL APPEARANCE

ADVISED OF RIGHTS ARRAIGNED ON INFORMATION RELEASED ON O/R

ADVISED OF CHARGES ARRAIGNED ON INDICTMENT ISSUED APPEARANCE BOND

NAME AS CHARGED IS TRUE NAME ARRAIGNM ENT READING W AIVED SUBSTANCE RELEASE AMT OF SECURITY $ 10,000PR BOND

TRUE NAME:

W AIVER OF INDICTMENT FILED

SPECIAL NOTES

PASSPORT SURRENDERED DATE:

PROPERTY TO BE POSTED CASH $ MOTION FOR DETENTION PRETRIAL SERVICES REPORT

CORPORATE SECURITY

REAL PROPERTY:

DETAINED

RELEASED

DETENTION HEARING AND FORMAL FINDINGS W AIVED

REMANDED TO CUSTODY

ORDER REMOVED TO THE DISTRICT OF CONSENT ENTERED PRESENTENCE REPORT ORDERED TO: NOT GUILTY CHANGE OF PLEA PLEA GUILTY PLEA AGREEMENT FILED CONTINUANCE BOND HEARING PRELIMINARY HEARING OR ARRAIGNMENT GUILTY TO COUNTS: OTHER:

4/4/08
AT:

ATTY APPT HEARING SUBMIT FINAN. AFFIDAVIT DETENTION HEARING TIME EXCLUDABLE UNDER 18 § USC 3161

STATUS RE: CONSENT CHANGE OF PLEA MOTIONS

STATUS / TRIAL SET OTHER

10:30 AM
BEFORE HON.

RS
TIME W AIVED

JUDGMENT & SENTENCING PROB/SUP REV. HEARING

IDENTITY / REMOVAL HEARING

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

ADDITIONAL PROCEEDINGS

BOTH COUNSEL AGREE THAT IF THE CASE IS TO BE DISMISSED IT MAY BE DONE PRIOR TO NEXT COURT DATE BY SUBMITTING PROPOSED ORDER AND THE NEXT HRG DATE WILL BE VACATED.