Free Proposed Order - District Court of California - California

Case 5:03-cv-04669-JW

Document 249

Filed 09/13/2004

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Gary M. Hoffman (Pro Hac Vice) Kenneth W. Brothers (Pro Hac Vice) DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO MORIN & OSHINSKY, LLP 2101 L Street, NW Washington, DC 20037-1526 Phone (202) 785-9700 Fax (202) 887-0689 Edward A. Meilman (Pro Hac Vice) DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO MORIN & OSHINSKY, LLP 1177 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10036-2714 Phone (212) 835-1400 Fax (212) 997-9880 Jeffrey B. Demain, State Bar No. 126715 Jonathan Weissglass, State Bar No. 185008 ALTSHULER, BERZON, NUSSBAUM, RUBIN & DEMAIN 177 Post Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, California 94108 Phone (415) 421-7151 Fax (415) 362-8064 Attorneys for Ricoh Company, Ltd. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION RICOH COMPANY, LTD., Plaintiff, vs. AEROFLEX INCORPORATED, et al., Defendants. SYNOPSYS, INC., Plaintiff, vs. RICOH COMPANY, LTD., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )) CASE NO. C-03-4669-MJJ (EMC) CASE NO. C-03-2289-MJJ (EMC) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING RICOH'S MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST

CASE NO. CV-03-4669-and 2289 MJJ (EMC) - Page 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING RICOH'S MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST

Case 5:03-cv-04669-JW

Document 249

Filed 09/13/2004

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

This matter is presented on the miscellaneous administrative request by plaintiff and declaratory judgment defendant Ricoh Co., Ltd. ("Ricoh") regarding the Markman briefs filed by the ASIC Defendants and Synopsys on September 10, 2004, and any response, and having been sufficiently advised of the premises, it is HEREBY ORDERED: The Markman briefs and related exhibits filed by ASIC Defendants and Synopsys on September 10, 2004, are hereby STRICKEN from the record. By no later than September __, 2004, the ASIC Defendants and Synopsys may file Markman briefs and related exhibits in compliance with this Court's Order of September 10, 2004. The ASIC Defendants and Synopsys are instructed that any such briefs shall be limited to intrinsic evidence. By no later than seven business days after it receives the ASIC Defendants and Synopsys' Markman brief, or seven days after the date of this order, whichever is later, Ricoh shall have the right to file a reply brief not to exceed 35 pages in length. SO ORDERED. _______________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT September __, 2004

CASE NO. CV-03-4669-and 2289 MJJ (EMC) - Page 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING RICOH'S MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST