Free Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 138.3 kB
Pages: 2
Date: May 8, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 304 Words, 1,903 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/8273/80.pdf

Download Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel - District Court of Delaware ( 138.3 kB)


Preview Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:04-cv-00921-SLR Document 80 Filed 05/08/2006 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
VURNIS L. GILLIS, )
I
Plaintiff, )
, I
v. )
) Civil Action No. 04-921-KAJ
STAN TAYLOR, PAUL HOWARD, )
THOMAS CARROLL, ELIZABETH )
BURRIS, LAWRENCE McGUlGEN, )
CHARLES CUNNINGHAM, NFN )
HOLMAN, EMILY STEVENSON, NMN )
PORTER, MERISSA Mc:FADDEN, )
JOESEPH HODSON, NMN WEISS, NMN )
KHO, NMN ROBINSON, MARTHA )
BOSTON, RICHARD SADOWSKI, )
KEVIN HOFFECKER, DIANNE )
STACHOWSKI, JIM SIMMS, NMN )
FEMME, NMN GWEN, CHAVON )
DOTTINS, IGC LISE MERSON, JOHN )
DOE THREE, MIKE LITTLE, ED )
JOHNSON, NLN MARIA, TIMOTHY )
MARTIN, BRIAN ENGRAMS, OSMAR )
SAMANDER, JOHN DOE FOUR, JOHN )
DOE SIX, JOHN DOE SEVEN, BRENDA )
HOLWERDA, NMN RAMON, JOHN DOE )
FIVE, )
I
Defendants. )
MEMORANDUM ORDER
Before me are three Motions to Appoint Counsel (Docket Items [D.I.] 72, 75, and
76 the "Motions") filed by the plaintiff Vurnis Gillis, ("Gi||is"). Because this Court has
already granted GilIis’ motion to appoint counsel, the Motions are moot. Gillis filed his
complaint in forma pauperis, requesting relief for Defendants violations of his
constitutional rights, and also alleging claims under state tort law. (D.|. 25). On
October 6, 2005 I granted Gi||is' motions to appoint counsel. Gi//is v. To/Iver, No. 04-
921, 2005 WL 2464991, at *6 (D.De|. Oct. 6, 2005). Since that time, Gillis has filed

Case 1:04-cv-00921-SLR Document 80 Filed 05/08/2006 Page 2 of 2
three additional Motions to Appoint Counsel. (D.l. 72, 75, and 76.) However, on May 5,
2005, I entered an order recognizing the entry of an appearance by Zhan Lu, Esquire,
on behalf of Gillis. (D.l. 79.)
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that GiIIis’ additional Motions to Appoint
Counsel (D.l. 72, 75, and 76) are denied as moot.
‘ ( id
hr l l 4.;,.
u na sTATEs oisr uoeiz
May 8, 2006
Wilmington, Delaware
2