Case 4:07-cv-05112-CW
Document 36-2
Filed 06/06/2008
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FILED
JUN 5 2008
M O LLY C . D W YER , C LER K O F C OU R T U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
STEPHEN MITCHELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, V. HAROLD NEMETZ, Dr.; OPEN DOOR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Defendants - Appellees.
No. 08-16343 D.C. No. 4:07-CV-05112-CW Northern District of California, Oakland TIME SCHEDULE ORDER
The parties shall meet the following time schedule:
Mon., June 9, 2008
Appellant/petitioner shall notify appellee/respondent of transcripts to be ordered, pursuant to 9th Cir. R. 10-3.1(a); Appellee/respondent shall notify appellant/petitioner of any additional transcripts needed, pursuant to 9th Cir. R. 10-3.1(b); Appellant/petitioner shall file transcript order form with the district court and make payment arrangements with court reporter, pursuant to 9th Cir. R. 10-3.1; Court reporter shall file transcript in the district court, pursuant to FRAP 11(b) and 9th Cir. R. 11-1.1;
Tue., June 17, 2008
Fri., June 27, 2008
Mon., July 28, 2008
Case 4:07-cv-05112-CW
Document 36-2
Filed 06/06/2008
Page 2 of 2
Fri., September 12, 2008
Appellant/petitioner's opening brief and excerpts of record shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 32 and 9th Cir. R. 32-1; The brief of appellee/respondent shall be filed and served, pursuant to FRAP 32 and 9th Cir. R. 32-1
Tue., October 14, 2008
The optional appellant/petitioner reply brief shall be filed and served within fourteen days of service of the appellee/respondent's brief, pursuant to FRAP 32 and 9th Cir. R. 32-1. Failure of the appellant to comply with the Time Schedule Order will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. 9th Cir. R. 42-1 Appellants/Petitioners without representation of counsel in a prisoner appeal may have their case submitted on the briefs and record without oral argument, pursuant to FRAP 34(a). Within 10 days of the filing of the appellant's opening brief, parties may file a statement setting forth the reasons why, in the opinion of the parties, oral argument should be heard.
FOR THE COURT: Molly C. Dwyer Clerk of Court
Ruben Talavera Deputy Clerk